1. Transaction with label "lab2" will start.
2. No, only one transaction in a thread.
These tests already added to PR: [1]

[1]: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7951/files

пн, 22 июн. 2020 г. в 14:58, Guru Stron <gurustronpub...@gmail.com>:

> Hello Alex,
>
> Thank you. Few more questions:
>
>    1. how something like this should behave:
>    *client.transactions().withLabel("lab1").withLabel("lab2") *
>    2. should it be possible for a thin client to start in one thread a
>    transaction with a label and without one?
>
> Thank you.
>
> `
>
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 06:28, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Looks like a bug. I've filled the ticket [1].
> >
> > Thanks for your report.
> >
> > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13170
> >
> > пн, 22 июн. 2020 г. в 02:05, Guru Stron <gurustronpub...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > To be more specific - test was added to thin client functional tests
> > > located in *org.apache.ignite.client.FunctionalTest.*
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 23:56, Guru Stron <gurustronpub...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear Igniters,
> > > >
> > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that Java thin client
> > > > *client.transactions().withLabel* functionality is broken. I've tried
> > to
> > > > add next test:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > * @Test    public void testTransactions1() throws Exception {
> > try
> > > > (Ignite ignite = Ignition.start(Config.getServerConfiguration());
> > > >    IgniteClient client =
> Ignition.startClient(getClientConfiguration())
> > > >     ) {            ClientCache<Integer, String> cache =
> > > > client.createCache(new ClientCacheConfiguration()
> > > > .setName("cache")
> > > > .setAtomicityMode(CacheAtomicityMode.TRANSACTIONAL)            );
> > > >   cache.put(0, "value0");            cache.put(1, "value1");
> > > //
> > > > Test implicit rollback when transaction closed.            try
> > > > (ClientTransaction tx =
> > > > client.transactions().withLabel("asdasda").txStart()) {
> > > > cache.put(1, "value2");            }
> assertEquals("value1",
> > > > cache.get(1));}    }*
> > > >
> > > > And it fails with:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *org.junit.ComparisonFailure: Expected :value1Actual   :value2*
> > > > Thank you.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to