No, nothing yet. I'm going to look to new version.

пн, 23 апр. 2018 г. в 17:43, Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com>:

> Hi all!
>
> Are there any news about PR merging?
>
> пн, 16 апр. 2018 г. в 19:43, Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Denis,
>>
>> module naming fixed
>>
>> пн, 16 апр. 2018 г. в 19:24, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
>>
>>> Roman,
>>>
>>> In my last reply, I voted for your approach - using "spring-data*_*2.0"
>>> for
>>> the new Spring version. However, please note that we use "_" symbol
>>> instead
>>> of "-" to separate a version from the package name.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Denis
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 8:17 AM, Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi all!
>>> >
>>> > So guys let’s make a decision. We leave code in current state as I
>>> suggest
>>> > or change module naming according Dmitry’s suggestion.
>>> > ср, 11 апр. 2018 г. в 1:54, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
>>> >
>>> > > Roman,
>>> > >
>>> > > Your suggestion sounds reasonable to me. Backing it up.
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Denis
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi all!
>>> > > >
>>> > > > IMHO if we do so we'll produce big pain for everybody while
>>> migrating
>>> > on
>>> > > > new version, because ones should change method and others should
>>> change
>>> > > > their poms. This change would be backward incompatible so it
>>> probably
>>> > > > should follow with major version upgrade, but I'm not sure about
>>> it.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Otherwise if we leave current state( spring-data for old and
>>> > > > spring-data-2.0 for new) we could support old users who probably
>>> use
>>> > > spring
>>> > > > data 1.0 (because spring data 2.0 release was not so long ago) and
>>> > > provide
>>> > > > new functionality for users who want to use new spring data.
>>> > > > In this case old users wouldn't change any in their code except
>>> ignite
>>> > > > version, and new users would include ignite in their Pom anyway and
>>> > could
>>> > > > choose which module of spring data to bring.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > After some time (probably on 3.0 release) we could change naming as
>>> > Denis
>>> > > > suggested.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Anyway I leave this decision up to you, just tell me what is the
>>> way to
>>> > > > finish this PR.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Regards, Roman.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > ср, 11 апр. 2018 г. в 1:35, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > In our Hibernate integration we define following two modules to
>>> > > > > distinguish incompatible versions:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >    - ignite-hiberbate_4.2
>>> > > > >    - ignite-hibernate_5.1
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > In Spark we have:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >    - ignite-spark
>>> > > > >    - ignite-spark_2.10
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > After thinking this over, I would do the following with Spring
>>> Data:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >    - ignite-spring-data for the latest Sprind Data 2.0
>>> > > > >    - ignite-spring-data_1.0
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > What do you think?
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > --
>>> > > > > Denis
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Dmitry Pavlov <
>>> > dpavlov....@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >> Thank you, Roman.
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Igniters,
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> IMO we should consider one more alternative - renaming of old
>>> module
>>> > > and
>>> > > > >> package names. Users, which prefer to stay on previous version
>>> will
>>> > be
>>> > > > >> requiered to update their pom's. In the same time users which
>>> are
>>> > > ready
>>> > > > to
>>> > > > >> migrate to spring data 2.0 will need to update methods naming.
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Denis M, what would you say?
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Sincerely,
>>> > > > >> Dmitriy Pavlov
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> вт, 10 апр. 2018 г. в 11:27, Роман Меерсон <
>>> homich1...@gmail.com>:
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >>> Hi Dmitry!
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>> I`ve just commited new fix. I renamed package of new module to
>>> > > > >>> springdata20, it helps us to separate old implementation from
>>> new
>>> > and
>>> > > > also
>>> > > > >>> should fix all compilation errors.
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 23:54, Роман Меерсон <
>>> homich1...@gmail.com>:
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>>> Ok, I'll check it, but I haven't face this problem.
>>> > > > >>>> If I'll find same issue, what is the proper way? Renaming to
>>> > > something
>>> > > > >>>> like Ignite2QueryGenerator or module removing?
>>> > > > >>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 23:40, Dmitry Pavlov <
>>> dpavlov....@gmail.com
>>> > >:
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>>> There are 2 classes IgniteQueryGenerator with same package
>>> name.
>>> > > > >>>>> Ignite in Idea can't compile.
>>> > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г., 21:38 Роман Меерсон <
>>> homich1...@gmail.com>:
>>> > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi Dmitry!
>>> > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>> Could you specify where you find conflict? Because I don’t
>>> have
>>> > > any.
>>> > > > >>>>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 21:09, Dmitry Pavlov <
>>> > dpavlov....@gmail.com
>>> > > >:
>>> > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Denis,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> could we support just one version instead of leaving
>>> compatible
>>> > > > >>>>>>> module?
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>> > > > >>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 20:08, Dmitry Pavlov <
>>> > dpavlov....@gmail.com
>>> > > >:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 20:07, Dmitry Pavlov <
>>> > > dpavlov....@gmail.com
>>> > > > >:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Roman,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I've applied PR locally and I have class name conflict at
>>> > least
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> for
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.springdata.repository.query.
>>> > > > IgniteQueryGenerator
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> How could we solve it? Is it better to rename class for
>>> new
>>> > > > plugin
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> version?
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> пт, 6 апр. 2018 г. в 17:38, Dmitry Pavlov <
>>> > > dpavlov....@gmail.com
>>> > > > >:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Excellend picture. I remember about this change.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> If Denis M. would be able to look througt the changes
>>> faster
>>> > > > than
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> me, I can merge without detailed review.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> пт, 6 апр. 2018 г. в 16:15, Роман Меерсон <
>>> > > homich1...@gmail.com
>>> > > > >:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> OK
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [image: 1486924635147168240.jpg]
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> пт, 6 апр. 2018 г. в 17:08, Igor Sapego <
>>> > isap...@apache.org
>>> > > >:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Dmitry has said he's going to merge it in 3-4
>>> days 2
>>> > > > days
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ago,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> so I guess, the merge is going to happen in 1-2 days
>>> or
>>> > so.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Роман Меерсон <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> homich1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi all!
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > As i see everything is awesome and there is no
>>> > objections,
>>> > > > so
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> when my PR
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > would be merged?
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > чт, 5 апр. 2018 г. в 18:58, Вячеслав Коптилин <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> slava.kopti...@gmail.com>:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > Thank you, Roman!
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > 2018-04-05 17:49 GMT+03:00 Роман Меерсон <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> homich1...@gmail.com>:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > Hi Slava,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > Fixed
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > чт, 5 апр. 2018 г. в 18:41, Вячеслав Коптилин <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > slava.kopti...@gmail.com
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > Hi Roman,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > please take into account my comment
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueryGenerator.java
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://reviews.ignite.apache.
>>> > org/ignite/review/IGNT-CR-541
>>> > > ?
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > commentId=de43c65f-9ac7-4080-
>>> > > > 9904-aec119138c94&filePath=/
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > modules/spring-data-2.0/src/
>>> > > > main/java/org/apache/ignite/
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > springdata/repository/query/
>>> > IgniteQueryGenerator.java
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > Best regards,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > Slava.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > 2018-04-05 14:59 GMT+03:00 Роман Меерсон <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> homich1...@gmail.com>:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > Ok, so waiting for accept and commit
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > чт, 5 апр. 2018 г. в 15:29, Alexey
>>> Kukushkin <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > kukushkinale...@gmail.com
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > Roman,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > Just pay commiter's (Dmitry Pavlov will
>>> most
>>> > > > likely
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> commit your
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > code)
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > attention to include the new test suite to
>>> > > > TeamCity
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > configuration.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>

Reply via email to