Hi all!

So guys let’s make a decision. We leave code in current state as I suggest
or change module naming according Dmitry’s suggestion.
ср, 11 апр. 2018 г. в 1:54, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:

> Roman,
>
> Your suggestion sounds reasonable to me. Backing it up.
>
> --
> Denis
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > IMHO if we do so we'll produce big pain for everybody while migrating on
> > new version, because ones should change method and others should change
> > their poms. This change would be backward incompatible so it probably
> > should follow with major version upgrade, but I'm not sure about it.
> >
> > Otherwise if we leave current state( spring-data for old and
> > spring-data-2.0 for new) we could support old users who probably use
> spring
> > data 1.0 (because spring data 2.0 release was not so long ago) and
> provide
> > new functionality for users who want to use new spring data.
> > In this case old users wouldn't change any in their code except ignite
> > version, and new users would include ignite in their Pom anyway and could
> > choose which module of spring data to bring.
> >
> > After some time (probably on 3.0 release) we could change naming as Denis
> > suggested.
> >
> > Anyway I leave this decision up to you, just tell me what is the way to
> > finish this PR.
> >
> > Regards, Roman.
> >
> > ср, 11 апр. 2018 г. в 1:35, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > In our Hibernate integration we define following two modules to
> > > distinguish incompatible versions:
> > >
> > >    - ignite-hiberbate_4.2
> > >    - ignite-hibernate_5.1
> > >
> > > In Spark we have:
> > >
> > >    - ignite-spark
> > >    - ignite-spark_2.10
> > >
> > > After thinking this over, I would do the following with Spring Data:
> > >
> > >    - ignite-spring-data for the latest Sprind Data 2.0
> > >    - ignite-spring-data_1.0
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Denis
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thank you, Roman.
> > >>
> > >> Igniters,
> > >>
> > >> IMO we should consider one more alternative - renaming of old module
> and
> > >> package names. Users, which prefer to stay on previous version will be
> > >> requiered to update their pom's. In the same time users which are
> ready
> > to
> > >> migrate to spring data 2.0 will need to update methods naming.
> > >>
> > >> Denis M, what would you say?
> > >>
> > >> Sincerely,
> > >> Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >>
> > >> вт, 10 апр. 2018 г. в 11:27, Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Dmitry!
> > >>>
> > >>> I`ve just commited new fix. I renamed package of new module to
> > >>> springdata20, it helps us to separate old implementation from new and
> > also
> > >>> should fix all compilation errors.
> > >>>
> > >>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 23:54, Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Ok, I'll check it, but I haven't face this problem.
> > >>>> If I'll find same issue, what is the proper way? Renaming to
> something
> > >>>> like Ignite2QueryGenerator or module removing?
> > >>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 23:40, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> There are 2 classes IgniteQueryGenerator with same package name.
> > >>>>> Ignite in Idea can't compile.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г., 21:38 Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi Dmitry!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Could you specify where you find conflict? Because I don’t have
> any.
> > >>>>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 21:09, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com
> >:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi Denis,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> could we support just one version instead of leaving compatible
> > >>>>>>> module?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Sincerely,
> > >>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 20:08, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com
> >:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 20:07, Dmitry Pavlov <
> dpavlov....@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Roman,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I've applied PR locally and I have class name conflict at least
> > >>>>>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.springdata.repository.query.
> > IgniteQueryGenerator
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> How could we solve it? Is it better to rename class for new
> > plugin
> > >>>>>>>>> version?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
> > >>>>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> пт, 6 апр. 2018 г. в 17:38, Dmitry Pavlov <
> dpavlov....@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Excellend picture. I remember about this change.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> If Denis M. would be able to look througt the changes faster
> > than
> > >>>>>>>>>> me, I can merge without detailed review.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> пт, 6 апр. 2018 г. в 16:15, Роман Меерсон <
> homich1...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> OK
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [image: 1486924635147168240.jpg]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> пт, 6 апр. 2018 г. в 17:08, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org
> >:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Dmitry has said he's going to merge it in 3-4 days 2
> > days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ago,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> so I guess, the merge is going to happen in 1-2 days or so.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Роман Меерсон <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> homich1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi all!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > As i see everything is awesome and there is no objections,
> > so
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> when my PR
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > would be merged?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > чт, 5 апр. 2018 г. в 18:58, Вячеслав Коптилин <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> slava.kopti...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > Thank you, Roman!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > 2018-04-05 17:49 GMT+03:00 Роман Меерсон <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> homich1...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > Hi Slava,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > Fixed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > чт, 5 апр. 2018 г. в 18:41, Вячеслав Коптилин <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > slava.kopti...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > Hi Roman,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > please take into account my comment
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueryGenerator.java
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://reviews.ignite.apache.org/ignite/review/IGNT-CR-541
> ?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > commentId=de43c65f-9ac7-4080-
> > 9904-aec119138c94&filePath=/
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > modules/spring-data-2.0/src/
> > main/java/org/apache/ignite/
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > springdata/repository/query/IgniteQueryGenerator.java
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > Slava.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > 2018-04-05 14:59 GMT+03:00 Роман Меерсон <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> homich1...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > Ok, so waiting for accept and commit
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > чт, 5 апр. 2018 г. в 15:29, Alexey Kukushkin <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > kukushkinale...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > Roman,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > Just pay commiter's (Dmitry Pavlov will most
> > likely
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> commit your
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > code)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > attention to include the new test suite to
> > TeamCity
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > configuration.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to