Hi all!

Are there any news about PR merging?

пн, 16 апр. 2018 г. в 19:43, Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com>:

> Denis,
>
> module naming fixed
>
> пн, 16 апр. 2018 г. в 19:24, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
>
>> Roman,
>>
>> In my last reply, I voted for your approach - using "spring-data*_*2.0"
>> for
>> the new Spring version. However, please note that we use "_" symbol
>> instead
>> of "-" to separate a version from the package name.
>>
>> --
>> Denis
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 8:17 AM, Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all!
>> >
>> > So guys let’s make a decision. We leave code in current state as I
>> suggest
>> > or change module naming according Dmitry’s suggestion.
>> > ср, 11 апр. 2018 г. в 1:54, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
>> >
>> > > Roman,
>> > >
>> > > Your suggestion sounds reasonable to me. Backing it up.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Denis
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi all!
>> > > >
>> > > > IMHO if we do so we'll produce big pain for everybody while
>> migrating
>> > on
>> > > > new version, because ones should change method and others should
>> change
>> > > > their poms. This change would be backward incompatible so it
>> probably
>> > > > should follow with major version upgrade, but I'm not sure about it.
>> > > >
>> > > > Otherwise if we leave current state( spring-data for old and
>> > > > spring-data-2.0 for new) we could support old users who probably use
>> > > spring
>> > > > data 1.0 (because spring data 2.0 release was not so long ago) and
>> > > provide
>> > > > new functionality for users who want to use new spring data.
>> > > > In this case old users wouldn't change any in their code except
>> ignite
>> > > > version, and new users would include ignite in their Pom anyway and
>> > could
>> > > > choose which module of spring data to bring.
>> > > >
>> > > > After some time (probably on 3.0 release) we could change naming as
>> > Denis
>> > > > suggested.
>> > > >
>> > > > Anyway I leave this decision up to you, just tell me what is the
>> way to
>> > > > finish this PR.
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards, Roman.
>> > > >
>> > > > ср, 11 апр. 2018 г. в 1:35, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
>> > > >
>> > > > > In our Hibernate integration we define following two modules to
>> > > > > distinguish incompatible versions:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >    - ignite-hiberbate_4.2
>> > > > >    - ignite-hibernate_5.1
>> > > > >
>> > > > > In Spark we have:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >    - ignite-spark
>> > > > >    - ignite-spark_2.10
>> > > > >
>> > > > > After thinking this over, I would do the following with Spring
>> Data:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >    - ignite-spring-data for the latest Sprind Data 2.0
>> > > > >    - ignite-spring-data_1.0
>> > > > >
>> > > > > What do you think?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Denis
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Dmitry Pavlov <
>> > dpavlov....@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Thank you, Roman.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Igniters,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> IMO we should consider one more alternative - renaming of old
>> module
>> > > and
>> > > > >> package names. Users, which prefer to stay on previous version
>> will
>> > be
>> > > > >> requiered to update their pom's. In the same time users which are
>> > > ready
>> > > > to
>> > > > >> migrate to spring data 2.0 will need to update methods naming.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Denis M, what would you say?
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Sincerely,
>> > > > >> Dmitriy Pavlov
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> вт, 10 апр. 2018 г. в 11:27, Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com
>> >:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> Hi Dmitry!
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> I`ve just commited new fix. I renamed package of new module to
>> > > > >>> springdata20, it helps us to separate old implementation from
>> new
>> > and
>> > > > also
>> > > > >>> should fix all compilation errors.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 23:54, Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com
>> >:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>> Ok, I'll check it, but I haven't face this problem.
>> > > > >>>> If I'll find same issue, what is the proper way? Renaming to
>> > > something
>> > > > >>>> like Ignite2QueryGenerator or module removing?
>> > > > >>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 23:40, Dmitry Pavlov <
>> dpavlov....@gmail.com
>> > >:
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>> There are 2 classes IgniteQueryGenerator with same package
>> name.
>> > > > >>>>> Ignite in Idea can't compile.
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г., 21:38 Роман Меерсон <homich1...@gmail.com
>> >:
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Hi Dmitry!
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Could you specify where you find conflict? Because I don’t
>> have
>> > > any.
>> > > > >>>>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 21:09, Dmitry Pavlov <
>> > dpavlov....@gmail.com
>> > > >:
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Denis,
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> could we support just one version instead of leaving
>> compatible
>> > > > >>>>>>> module?
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Sincerely,
>> > > > >>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 20:08, Dmitry Pavlov <
>> > dpavlov....@gmail.com
>> > > >:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 20:07, Dmitry Pavlov <
>> > > dpavlov....@gmail.com
>> > > > >:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Roman,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I've applied PR locally and I have class name conflict at
>> > least
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> for
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.springdata.repository.query.
>> > > > IgniteQueryGenerator
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> How could we solve it? Is it better to rename class for
>> new
>> > > > plugin
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> version?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> пт, 6 апр. 2018 г. в 17:38, Dmitry Pavlov <
>> > > dpavlov....@gmail.com
>> > > > >:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Excellend picture. I remember about this change.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> If Denis M. would be able to look througt the changes
>> faster
>> > > > than
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> me, I can merge without detailed review.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> пт, 6 апр. 2018 г. в 16:15, Роман Меерсон <
>> > > homich1...@gmail.com
>> > > > >:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> OK
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [image: 1486924635147168240.jpg]
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> пт, 6 апр. 2018 г. в 17:08, Igor Sapego <
>> > isap...@apache.org
>> > > >:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Dmitry has said he's going to merge it in 3-4
>> days 2
>> > > > days
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ago,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> so I guess, the merge is going to happen in 1-2 days or
>> > so.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Роман Меерсон <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> homich1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi all!
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > As i see everything is awesome and there is no
>> > objections,
>> > > > so
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> when my PR
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > would be merged?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > чт, 5 апр. 2018 г. в 18:58, Вячеслав Коптилин <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> slava.kopti...@gmail.com>:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > Thank you, Roman!
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > 2018-04-05 17:49 GMT+03:00 Роман Меерсон <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> homich1...@gmail.com>:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > Hi Slava,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > Fixed
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > чт, 5 апр. 2018 г. в 18:41, Вячеслав Коптилин <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > slava.kopti...@gmail.com
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > Hi Roman,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > please take into account my comment
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueryGenerator.java
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://reviews.ignite.apache.
>> > org/ignite/review/IGNT-CR-541
>> > > ?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > commentId=de43c65f-9ac7-4080-
>> > > > 9904-aec119138c94&filePath=/
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > modules/spring-data-2.0/src/
>> > > > main/java/org/apache/ignite/
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > springdata/repository/query/
>> > IgniteQueryGenerator.java
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > Best regards,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > Slava.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > 2018-04-05 14:59 GMT+03:00 Роман Меерсон <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> homich1...@gmail.com>:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > Ok, so waiting for accept and commit
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > чт, 5 апр. 2018 г. в 15:29, Alexey Kukushkin
>> <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > kukushkinale...@gmail.com
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > Roman,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > Just pay commiter's (Dmitry Pavlov will
>> most
>> > > > likely
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> commit your
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > code)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > attention to include the new test suite to
>> > > > TeamCity
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > configuration.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to