I think I agree about digits. Will fix.
> On 15 Mar 2018, at 20:09, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com> wrote: > > In using digits in suite name, there is nothing to do with > short-sightedness. > > I think this is a matter of taste, so I would like to hear the opinion of > all. > > чт, 15 мар. 2018 г. в 20:02, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com>: > >> I understand conservatism and inertia of such changes. >> But thus we are sticking to arrogance and shortsightedness of previous >> engineers who worked on this project, while trying to make it better. >> My point is - without some legacy cleaning and approaches review it >> becomes impossible to introduce any meaningful improvements to the project >> we are so hardly working on. >> >> >> >>> On 15 Mar 2018, at 19:45, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I think it is better to keep existing naming because Igniters are used to >>> it. >>> >>> Moreover a lot of issues use suite name as reference on where test is >>> located. So I prefer existing naming. >>> >>> чт, 15 мар. 2018 г. в 19:43, vveider <mr.wei...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hi, Igniters! >>>> >>>> >>>> Took the liberty to introduce minor refactoring into test build names in >>>> our >>>> (now) main test project Ignite Tests 2.4+ (Java 8) [1] >>>> Changes affected the numeration of tests with common name, i.e >>>> Ignite Basic => Ignite Basic [I] >>>> Ignite Basic 2 => Ignite Basic [II] >>>> And so on. >>>> My main motivation is common design for the test project, including >> naming >>>> policy. It will help maintain this project in future with much less >>>> efforts. >>>> >>>> I earnestly encourage community to be a little bit patient while works >> on >>>> test improvements are held and counting on your support. >>>> >>>> As always - open to questions and constructive criticism. >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] >> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/ >>>> >> >>
