In using digits in suite name, there is nothing to do with short-sightedness.
I think this is a matter of taste, so I would like to hear the opinion of all. чт, 15 мар. 2018 г. в 20:02, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com>: > I understand conservatism and inertia of such changes. > But thus we are sticking to arrogance and shortsightedness of previous > engineers who worked on this project, while trying to make it better. > My point is - without some legacy cleaning and approaches review it > becomes impossible to introduce any meaningful improvements to the project > we are so hardly working on. > > > > > On 15 Mar 2018, at 19:45, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I think it is better to keep existing naming because Igniters are used to > > it. > > > > Moreover a lot of issues use suite name as reference on where test is > > located. So I prefer existing naming. > > > > чт, 15 мар. 2018 г. в 19:43, vveider <mr.wei...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Hi, Igniters! > >> > >> > >> Took the liberty to introduce minor refactoring into test build names in > >> our > >> (now) main test project Ignite Tests 2.4+ (Java 8) [1] > >> Changes affected the numeration of tests with common name, i.e > >> Ignite Basic => Ignite Basic [I] > >> Ignite Basic 2 => Ignite Basic [II] > >> And so on. > >> My main motivation is common design for the test project, including > naming > >> policy. It will help maintain this project in future with much less > >> efforts. > >> > >> I earnestly encourage community to be a little bit patient while works > on > >> test improvements are held and counting on your support. > >> > >> As always - open to questions and constructive criticism. > >> > >> > >> [1] > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8 > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/ > >> > >
