I think it is better to keep existing naming because Igniters are used to it.
Moreover a lot of issues use suite name as reference on where test is located. So I prefer existing naming. чт, 15 мар. 2018 г. в 19:43, vveider <mr.wei...@gmail.com>: > Hi, Igniters! > > > Took the liberty to introduce minor refactoring into test build names in > our > (now) main test project Ignite Tests 2.4+ (Java 8) [1] > Changes affected the numeration of tests with common name, i.e > Ignite Basic => Ignite Basic [I] > Ignite Basic 2 => Ignite Basic [II] > And so on. > My main motivation is common design for the test project, including naming > policy. It will help maintain this project in future with much less > efforts. > > I earnestly encourage community to be a little bit patient while works on > test improvements are held and counting on your support. > > As always - open to questions and constructive criticism. > > > [1] https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8 > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/ >
