Hi all, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3793 is completed. Kindly take a look at the corresponding PR https://github.com/apache/ ignite/pull/1475 .
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > We need to replace content of ignite-core-licenses.txt file which is the > following at the moment > > // ------------------------------------------------------------------ > // List of ignite-core module's dependencies provided as a part of this > distribution > // which licenses differ from Apache Software License. > // ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ============================================================ > ================== > For JSR107 API and SPI (https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec) > javax.cache:cache-api:jar:1.0.0 > ============================================================ > ================== > This product bundles JSR107 API and SPI which is available under a: > JSR-000107 JCACHE 2.9 Public Review - Updated Specification License. For > details, see https://raw.github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/master/LICENSE.txt. > > > Updated this ticket description: https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/IGNITE-3793 > > — > Denis > > On Jan 24, 2017, at 8:24 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Awesome, you are right. I just checked and the license is indeed Apache > > 2.0. Is there anything we need to do at all right now? > > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> This change was incorporated in this ticket: https://issues.apache. > >> org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3793. We can't do it before 2.0 for compatibility > >> reasons. > >> > >> However, my point is that they changed the license to Apache 2.0, so I'm > >> not sure that licensing issue still exists. > >> > >> -Val > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > dsetrak...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Any reason why we need to wait for 2.0? Sorry if this has already been > >>> discussed. > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Yes, we planned to do that in 2.0. Val, the ticket is closed > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2949 < > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2949> > >>>> > >>>> Do we need to reopen it making sure that geronimo jar is added to 2.0? > >>>> > >>>> — > >>>> Denis > >>>> > >>>>> On Jan 24, 2017, at 6:36 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > >> dsetrak...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> We absolutely need to upgrade to the geronimo jcache library in the > >>> next > >>>>> release. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > >>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Guys, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I noticed that the JCache license was updated to Apache 2.0 several > >>>> months > >>>>>> ago [1]. However, there was no release with the new license and > >> 1.0.0 > >>>> still > >>>>>> has the old license name in the POM file [2] (the link is pointing > >> to > >>>> the > >>>>>> new one though). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Is this enough from legal standpoint? Do we still need to move to > >>>> Geronimo? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/blob/master/LICENSE.txt > >>>>>> [2] http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/javax.cache/cache-api/1.0.0 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -Val > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > >>>> dsetrak...@apache.org> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I would say that we are OK with alpha for now, as there is no real > >>>>>>> difference between 1.0-alpha and 1.0. We can switch to 1.0 whenever > >>>>>>> geronimo project updates the JAR. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> D. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > >>>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Folks, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I tried to switch to Geronimo and it works fine for me. Are we > >> going > >>>> to > >>>>>>>> wait for version 1.0, or we're OK with alpha? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -Val > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > >>>>>>> dsetrak...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Igniters, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Can someone check if the Geronimo JCache jar is the same as the > >>>>>> JSR107? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.geronimo. > >>>>>>> specs/geronimo-jcache_1.0_spec > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> We should try switching to the Geronimo JAR starting next > >> release, > >>> as > >>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>> licensed under Apache 2.0. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> D. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > -- Kind regards, Alexander.
