Guys, I noticed that the JCache license was updated to Apache 2.0 several months ago [1]. However, there was no release with the new license and 1.0.0 still has the old license name in the POM file [2] (the link is pointing to the new one though).
Is this enough from legal standpoint? Do we still need to move to Geronimo? [1] https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/blob/master/LICENSE.txt [2] http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/javax.cache/cache-api/1.0.0 -Val On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote: > I would say that we are OK with alpha for now, as there is no real > difference between 1.0-alpha and 1.0. We can switch to 1.0 whenever > geronimo project updates the JAR. > > D. > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > I tried to switch to Geronimo and it works fine for me. Are we going to > > wait for version 1.0, or we're OK with alpha? > > > > -Val > > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > dsetrak...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > Can someone check if the Geronimo JCache jar is the same as the JSR107? > > > > > > > > > > > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.geronimo. > specs/geronimo-jcache_1.0_spec > > > > > > We should try switching to the Geronimo JAR starting next release, as > it > > is > > > licensed under Apache 2.0. > > > > > > D. > > > > > >
