Any reason why we need to wait for 2.0? Sorry if this has already been discussed.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > Yes, we planned to do that in 2.0. Val, the ticket is closed > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2949 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2949> > > Do we need to reopen it making sure that geronimo jar is added to 2.0? > > — > Denis > > > On Jan 24, 2017, at 6:36 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > We absolutely need to upgrade to the geronimo jcache library in the next > > release. > > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Guys, > >> > >> I noticed that the JCache license was updated to Apache 2.0 several > months > >> ago [1]. However, there was no release with the new license and 1.0.0 > still > >> has the old license name in the POM file [2] (the link is pointing to > the > >> new one though). > >> > >> Is this enough from legal standpoint? Do we still need to move to > Geronimo? > >> > >> [1] https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/blob/master/LICENSE.txt > >> [2] http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/javax.cache/cache-api/1.0.0 > >> > >> -Val > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > dsetrak...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I would say that we are OK with alpha for now, as there is no real > >>> difference between 1.0-alpha and 1.0. We can switch to 1.0 whenever > >>> geronimo project updates the JAR. > >>> > >>> D. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > >>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Folks, > >>>> > >>>> I tried to switch to Geronimo and it works fine for me. Are we going > to > >>>> wait for version 1.0, or we're OK with alpha? > >>>> > >>>> -Val > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > >>> dsetrak...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Igniters, > >>>>> > >>>>> Can someone check if the Geronimo JCache jar is the same as the > >> JSR107? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.geronimo. > >>> specs/geronimo-jcache_1.0_spec > >>>>> > >>>>> We should try switching to the Geronimo JAR starting next release, as > >>> it > >>>> is > >>>>> licensed under Apache 2.0. > >>>>> > >>>>> D. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
