+1 (non-binding) Looking good.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 9:09 AM vaquar khan <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > Regards, > Viquar Khan > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2026, 12:00 PM Maninder Parmar <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, 11:27 PM Péter Váry <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, 20:53 Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> Thanks Russell. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:41 AM Russell Spitzer >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi y'all, >>>>> >>>>> It's been a while, and I think we already have consensus here >>>>> but I wanted to raise this vote for awareness/consensus before merging. >>>>> >>>>> Scan planning has stated since #4272 that duplicate live file paths in >>>>> a snapshot produce undefined scan results. This PR makes that expectation >>>>> explicit as a snapshot invariant in the main body of the spec. >>>>> >>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the spec clarification in 17198 >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not approve (please provide reasons) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your time, >>>>> Russ >>>>> >>>>> -- Regards Junwang Zhao
