+1 (non-binding) On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 9:38 AM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > Looking good. > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 9:09 AM vaquar khan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Regards, > > Viquar Khan > > > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2026, 12:00 PM Maninder Parmar < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, 11:27 PM Péter Váry <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, 20:53 Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>> Thanks Russell. > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:41 AM Russell Spitzer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi y'all, > >>>>> > >>>>> It's been a while, and I think we already have consensus here > >>>>> but I wanted to raise this vote for awareness/consensus before > merging. > >>>>> > >>>>> Scan planning has stated since #4272 that duplicate live file paths > in > >>>>> a snapshot produce undefined scan results. This PR makes that > expectation > >>>>> explicit as a snapshot invariant in the main body of the spec. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the spec clarification in 17198 > >>>>> [ ] +0 > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not approve (please provide reasons) > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks for your time, > >>>>> Russ > >>>>> > >>>>> > > > -- > Regards > Junwang Zhao >
