+1 (binding) On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 8:13 AM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 1:13 PM Péter Váry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > +1 binding > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2026, 04:15 roryqi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> 于2026年5月21日周四 07:48写道： > >> > > >> > +1 (non-binding). PR looks good. Thanks Ryan. > >> > > >> > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 4:45 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> +1 (binding) > >> >> thanks! > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 4:23 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> +1 (binding) > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 4:15 PM Steve <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> +1 (non-binding) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 2:41 PM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > +1 (non-binding), this will be useful for catalog migration > scenarios. > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > Thanks, > >> >>>> > Alex > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 10:40 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > +1 > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 1:39 PM Russell Spitzer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> +1 > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 3:37 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> Hi everyone, > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> I think that there is general agreement for adding an > `unregister` endpoint to the REST spec, so I'd like to vote on the > addition. The PR is #16400. > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> Unregister is the opposite of `register` and allows you to > remove a table from a catalog without deleting its underlying data and > metadata files. The purpose is to allow moving from one catalog to another. > This requires a new endpoint because the underlying table data and metadata > files should be left in place, and the latest catalog state of the table > should be returned. > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> Please vote in the next 72 hours, > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> [ ] +1: Add unregister to the REST spec > >> >>>> > >>> [ ] +0: Note a non-blocking concern . . . > >> >>>> > >>> [ ] -1: Do not add unregister because . . . > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> Thanks, > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> Ryan >
