+1(binding) Thanks Ryan! Yufei
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 1:37 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I think that there is general agreement for adding an `unregister` > endpoint to the REST spec, so I'd like to vote on the addition. The PR is > #16400 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16400>. > > Unregister is the opposite of `register` and allows you to remove a table > from a catalog without deleting its underlying data and metadata files. The > purpose is to allow moving from one catalog to another. This requires a new > endpoint because the underlying table data and metadata files should be > left in place, and the latest catalog state of the table should be returned. > > Please vote in the next 72 hours, > > [ ] +1: Add unregister to the REST spec > [ ] +0: Note a non-blocking concern . . . > [ ] -1: Do not add unregister because . . . > > Thanks, > > Ryan >
