+1 to remove the support of 3.9. On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 11:28 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 6:31 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 3:10 PM Alex Stephen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Python 3.9 is EOL. We shouldn't be encouraging users to stay on EOL >>> versions of Python. >>> >>> This can be our community's contribution towards the Python ecosystem's >>> migration off 3.9. It's great to help out our fellow OSS projects! >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2025 at 8:48 AM Honah J. <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 to remove 3.9 support. Thanks for driving this! >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Jonas (Honah) >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2025 at 10:07 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> It makes sense to me. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks ! >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 7:06 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi everyone, >>>>> > >>>>> > I wanted to check if there are any objections to dropping Python 3.9 >>>>> support. Dropping means that we won't publish 3.9 wheels anymore. >>>>> > >>>>> > The two main reasons to do this: >>>>> > >>>>> > Reduce the CI cost when we add 3.13 >>>>> > Downstream projects like numpy and ray often support three Python >>>>> versions. If we want to support more, we have to have conditional >>>>> dependencies based on the Python version. This makes Poetry very slow, as >>>>> the work effectively doubles. >>>>> > >>>>> > Python 3.9 is marked as EoL next week. Around 5% of the downloads >>>>> are Python 3.9. But as Kevin pointed out, most of that will probably be >>>>> our >>>>> CI. >>>>> > >>>>> > Let us know if there are any objections! >>>>> > >>>>> > Kind regards, >>>>> > Fokko >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>
