+1 On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 6:31 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 3:10 PM Alex Stephen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Python 3.9 is EOL. We shouldn't be encouraging users to stay on EOL >> versions of Python. >> >> This can be our community's contribution towards the Python ecosystem's >> migration off 3.9. It's great to help out our fellow OSS projects! >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2025 at 8:48 AM Honah J. <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 to remove 3.9 support. Thanks for driving this! >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Jonas (Honah) >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2025 at 10:07 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> It makes sense to me. >>>> >>>> Thanks ! >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 7:06 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hi everyone, >>>> > >>>> > I wanted to check if there are any objections to dropping Python 3.9 >>>> support. Dropping means that we won't publish 3.9 wheels anymore. >>>> > >>>> > The two main reasons to do this: >>>> > >>>> > Reduce the CI cost when we add 3.13 >>>> > Downstream projects like numpy and ray often support three Python >>>> versions. If we want to support more, we have to have conditional >>>> dependencies based on the Python version. This makes Poetry very slow, as >>>> the work effectively doubles. >>>> > >>>> > Python 3.9 is marked as EoL next week. Around 5% of the downloads are >>>> Python 3.9. But as Kevin pointed out, most of that will probably be our CI. >>>> > >>>> > Let us know if there are any objections! >>>> > >>>> > Kind regards, >>>> > Fokko >>>> > >>>> >>>
