Following up on this thread, we re-organized the navbar in https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13774. And now the "Community" page is top-level, right between "Projection" and "Specification". The previous navbar items are moved into the Community page. See it for yourself at https://iceberg.apache.org/
[image: image.png] Cheers, Kevin Liu On Sat, Aug 9, 2025 at 9:58 AM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> wrote: > Thank you Danica for updating the Community page! ( > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13520) > It's a much needed improvement and we can continue to refine the page as > needed. Its already live at > https://iceberg.apache.org/community/#connect-with-community-events > > Best, > Kevin Liu > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 9:27 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Ok I think we have had a general approval here, I'll put up a PR for our >> doc page for folks to do a final pass on >> >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 8:33 AM Danica Fine >> <danica.f...@snowflake.com.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm picking this thread back up... >>> >>> If we're in agreement that we'd like to enable more meetups, I'd be more >>> than happy to start documenting the meetup guidelines (and a reminder of >>> the trademark guidelines that Max mentioned) to put on the community >>> section of the website. >>> >>> And on that note... I'd love to host an Iceberg meetup in Atlanta on >>> July 24th at the Snowflake office. We've had a number of community members >>> express interest on the Iceberg Slack, and I believe we'll have a solid >>> agenda of sessions! Following the format of the Seattle and Bay Area >>> events, we'll have a Call for Papers and have a "committee" of a few >>> community members select talks. I am finalizing sponsors for the event now >>> and will update the details as they come in. For your reference, here is >>> the event page on Luma <https://lu.ma/vdbjh2fc>. >>> >>> Please let me know if this aligns with our above discussions. If not, >>> I'm happy to make changes to comply! >>> >>> Excited to kick off more meetups globally! >>> >>> Best, >>> Danica >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 1:29 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> That was my point in my previous email on this thread, and that’s why I >>>> shared the trademark policy. >>>> >>>> The updated proposal (including Max and Danica updates) looks good to >>>> me. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> Le jeu. 29 mai 2025 à 14:48, Rich Bowen <rbo...@apache.org> a écrit : >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2025/05/23 19:24:28 Russell Spitzer wrote: >>>>> > Hey Y'all >>>>> > >>>>> > Basically I would like to get the PMC out of the meetup approval >>>>> business >>>>> ... >>>>> > Please let me know what you think, >>>>> >>>>> (Board hat) >>>>> >>>>> A critical role of a PMC is being stewards of the project's >>>>> brands/marks. So while it's not necessary that the PMC micromanage each >>>>> individual meetup, it is important that they are *aware* of them, and are >>>>> doing due dilligence to ensure that those brands are being used >>>>> appropriately. >>>>> >>>>> I don't think that necessarily means that there is an approval vote >>>>> for each one. That is, indeed, too much micromanagement. But I would >>>>> encurage project members (whether PMC or not) who attend these events to >>>>> be >>>>> aware of the brand policy, and point out to meetup organizers when they're >>>>> being violated (which I would expect to be very infrequent!). >>>>> >>>>> That is to say, +1 in general to your proposal here, with the >>>>> understanding that the project as a whole owns the project's brands, and >>>>> should be diligent about ensuring that they are not abused. >>>>> >>>>
