+1 (binding) On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 6:32 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner <etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 4:14 AM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The clarification is simple and clear from the writer's perspective. >> >> CMIW, the implication is that reader should drop bbox with any NaN value >> regardless of the coordinate axis (in case of a writer bug). >> >> On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 6:21 AM Huang-Hsiang Cheng >> <hua...@apple.com.invalid> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On May 6, 2025, at 2:53 PM, Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Thanks to Jia and Szehon for the quick turn-around getting this done! >>> >>> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 2:37 PM Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> Thanks for putting this together! >>>> >>>> Jia Yu >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 2:09 PM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> As discussed briefly in >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ncj0xjh2ct5xvovn4tzc45lkm1wbmorq, >>>>> there is a minor clarification for geo type bounds that we want to get in >>>>> for finalizing V3 spec. We want to clarify the behavior of null/NaN >>>>> coordinate values in geo objects. There can be many coordinate values in >>>>> a >>>>> geo object, only the null/NaN ones are skipped, the rest are not skipped. >>>>> >>>>> I would like to raise a vote for this minor change to V3 spec. The PR >>>>> is: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12956. >>>>> >>>>> This is going on in parallel with a parquet-format pr: >>>>> https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/494 >>>>> >>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Add these simplifications to the V3 Geo spec >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Szehon >>>>> >>>> >>>
