+1 (binding) Thanks to Jia and Szehon for the quick turn-around getting this done!
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 2:37 PM Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks for putting this together! > > Jia Yu > > On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 2:09 PM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> As discussed briefly in >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ncj0xjh2ct5xvovn4tzc45lkm1wbmorq, there >> is a minor clarification for geo type bounds that we want to get in for >> finalizing V3 spec. We want to clarify the behavior of null/NaN coordinate >> values in geo objects. There can be many coordinate values in a geo >> object, only the null/NaN ones are skipped, the rest are not skipped. >> >> I would like to raise a vote for this minor change to V3 spec. The PR >> is: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12956. >> >> This is going on in parallel with a parquet-format pr: >> https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/494 >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 Add these simplifications to the V3 Geo spec >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >> >> Thanks, >> Szehon >> >
