Hi folks, For Iceberg Geo, we are still waiting for the PR of geospatial bounds and geospatial predicate to be merged: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12667
Should a release with core updates include this PR? Thanks, Jia On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 10:21 PM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agree with Russell and JB that we make a "RC" release for V3 spec to test > implementations, compatibility, etc before finalizing it. > > Thanks, > Manu > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 12:24 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> Hi Ryan >> >> It sounds good. >> >> About multi-args transforms, with the clarification we did a couple of >> weeks ago, I think we are good. >> Maybe a release with the core updated before announcing spec v3 >> officially would be a good idea ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> Le mer. 30 avr. 2025 à 00:35, Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I think we’ve reached the point where it’s time to finalize and adopt >>> the changes for Iceberg v3. We’ve been working toward this for the last few >>> months and have now implemented the v3 features in the Java library to >>> reduce the risk of needing changes or hitting problems (row lineage support >>> in Spark 3.5 just went in!). We’ve also incorporated some clarifications >>> and minor changes back into the spec from what we’ve learned. >>> >>> At this point, I’m confident that the spec is reasonable and correct. >>> Thank you to everyone working on these reference implementations! >>> >>> The next step is to discuss any outstanding items or concerns about >>> moving forward, and then to have a vote thread to adopt the spec. I’ll >>> start off with a couple of items: >>> >>> One potential concern is that the upstream Variant spec hasn’t yet been >>> finalized by the Parquet community, but we’ve built a full, independent >>> implementation in Iceberg to validate the spec. I think the Parquet >>> community is primarily waiting on getting the PRs in to have a Java >>> reference implementation, so the risk of changes to the Variant spec is >>> small. >>> >>> There’s also an on-going vote to add encryption keys in support of full >>> table encryption that I think we want to get in. >>> >>> Any other items we may want to clear up? >>> >>> Ryan >>> >>
