Hi Ryan It sounds good.
About multi-args transforms, with the clarification we did a couple of weeks ago, I think we are good. Maybe a release with the core updated before announcing spec v3 officially would be a good idea ? Regards JB Le mer. 30 avr. 2025 à 00:35, Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > I think we’ve reached the point where it’s time to finalize and adopt the > changes for Iceberg v3. We’ve been working toward this for the last few > months and have now implemented the v3 features in the Java library to > reduce the risk of needing changes or hitting problems (row lineage support > in Spark 3.5 just went in!). We’ve also incorporated some clarifications > and minor changes back into the spec from what we’ve learned. > > At this point, I’m confident that the spec is reasonable and correct. > Thank you to everyone working on these reference implementations! > > The next step is to discuss any outstanding items or concerns about moving > forward, and then to have a vote thread to adopt the spec. I’ll start off > with a couple of items: > > One potential concern is that the upstream Variant spec hasn’t yet been > finalized by the Parquet community, but we’ve built a full, independent > implementation in Iceberg to validate the spec. I think the Parquet > community is primarily waiting on getting the PRs in to have a Java > reference implementation, so the risk of changes to the Variant spec is > small. > > There’s also an on-going vote to add encryption keys in support of full > table encryption that I think we want to get in. > > Any other items we may want to clear up? > > Ryan >
