+1 (non-binding) 1. Run the tests 2. Test against Snowflake build
Thanks Aihua On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 7:02 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > 1. Verified sigs/checksum/license > 2. Ran build/test with JDK 17 > > Thanks Ajantha for running the release! > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:07 AM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> 1. checked sigs/checksum/license >> 2. ran tests using JDK 17 >> >> Thanks for running the release! >> >> Best regards, >> Honah >> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 8:47 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> * checked signatures / checksum >>> * ran tests using JDK 17 >>> * ran Spark quickstart examples and a few manual tests >>> >>> Thanks for running the release Ajantha. >>> >>> Eduard >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 3:22 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> - Checked the signatures, checksum and licenses. >>>> - Did some checks >>>> <https://github.com/databricks/docker-spark-iceberg/pull/220/> against >>>> example notebooks. >>>> >>>> Thanks for running this release! >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Fokko >>>> >>>> Op wo 23 apr 2025 om 21:41 schreef Russell Spitzer < >>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> +1 Binding >>>>> Did the normal tests >>>>> Rat Check and such >>>>> Signature Checks out - Eduard's >>>>> >>>>> -- I do keep having an issue with some of the S3 Signing tests which >>>>> require me to keep adjusting my local config inorder for the tests to >>>>> past. >>>>> (Requested ports already bound) So that would be nice to clean up if >>>>> possible. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 10:04 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> I checked: >>>>>> - Signature and checksum are good >>>>>> - ASF header present in all expected file in the source distribution >>>>>> - No binary file found in the source distribution >>>>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the source distribution >>>>>> - Build works from the source distribution >>>>>> - Tested without problem on Flink and Spark with Apache Polaris (with >>>>>> a couple of changes in Polaris) >>>>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the aws-bundle jar >>>>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the azure-bundle jar >>>>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the gcp-bundle jar >>>>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the kafka-connect-runtime distributions >>>>>> (main and hive) >>>>>> - Not for later: how do we distribution the kafka-connect-runtime >>>>>> distributions >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 3:45 PM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Hi Everyone, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>>> Iceberg 1.9.0 release. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The commit ID is 7dbafb438ee1e68d0047bebcb587265d7d87d8a1 >>>>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.0-rc2 >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.0-rc2 >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/7dbafb438ee1e68d0047bebcb587265d7d87d8a1 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.0-rc2 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>> > * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>>>> repository URL is: >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1190/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 >>>>>> > [ ] +0 >>>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members >>>>>> are encouraged to cast >>>>>> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>>>>> votes and more binding >>>>>> > +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > - Ajantha >>>>>> >>>>>
