+1 (binding) 1. Verified sigs/checksum/license 2. Ran build/test with JDK 17
Thanks Ajantha for running the release! On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:07 AM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > 1. checked sigs/checksum/license > 2. ran tests using JDK 17 > > Thanks for running the release! > > Best regards, > Honah > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 8:47 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> * checked signatures / checksum >> * ran tests using JDK 17 >> * ran Spark quickstart examples and a few manual tests >> >> Thanks for running the release Ajantha. >> >> Eduard >> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 3:22 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> - Checked the signatures, checksum and licenses. >>> - Did some checks >>> <https://github.com/databricks/docker-spark-iceberg/pull/220/> against >>> example notebooks. >>> >>> Thanks for running this release! >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Fokko >>> >>> Op wo 23 apr 2025 om 21:41 schreef Russell Spitzer < >>> russell.spit...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> +1 Binding >>>> Did the normal tests >>>> Rat Check and such >>>> Signature Checks out - Eduard's >>>> >>>> -- I do keep having an issue with some of the S3 Signing tests which >>>> require me to keep adjusting my local config inorder for the tests to past. >>>> (Requested ports already bound) So that would be nice to clean up if >>>> possible. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 10:04 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>> >>>>> I checked: >>>>> - Signature and checksum are good >>>>> - ASF header present in all expected file in the source distribution >>>>> - No binary file found in the source distribution >>>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the source distribution >>>>> - Build works from the source distribution >>>>> - Tested without problem on Flink and Spark with Apache Polaris (with >>>>> a couple of changes in Polaris) >>>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the aws-bundle jar >>>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the azure-bundle jar >>>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the gcp-bundle jar >>>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the kafka-connect-runtime distributions >>>>> (main and hive) >>>>> - Not for later: how do we distribution the kafka-connect-runtime >>>>> distributions >>>>> >>>>> Thanks ! >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 3:45 PM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi Everyone, >>>>> > >>>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>> Iceberg 1.9.0 release. >>>>> > >>>>> > The commit ID is 7dbafb438ee1e68d0047bebcb587265d7d87d8a1 >>>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.0-rc2 >>>>> > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.0-rc2 >>>>> > * >>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/7dbafb438ee1e68d0047bebcb587265d7d87d8a1 >>>>> > >>>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>> > * >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.0-rc2 >>>>> > >>>>> > You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>> > * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>> > >>>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>>> repository URL is: >>>>> > * >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1190/ >>>>> > >>>>> > Please download, verify, and test. >>>>> > >>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>> > >>>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 >>>>> > [ ] +0 >>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>> > >>>>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are >>>>> encouraged to cast >>>>> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>>>> votes and more binding >>>>> > +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>>> > >>>>> > - Ajantha >>>>> >>>>
