+1 (binding) but I've also had the same tests fail that Honah mentioned
earlier (which are due to deprecated dependencies)

On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 3:52 AM Sung Yun <sun...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Checked signatures, checksums and validated license headers.
>
> Ran the coverage tests using python3.12.
>
> Sung
>
> On 2024/12/03 21:37:48 Fokko Driesprong wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Checked checksums, signatures, and licenses.
> >
> > Honah, there are some open PRs to bump to the latest dependencies (e.g.
> Pandas
> > 2.2.3 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1282>), except for
> the
> > warning, everything works well. Would be good to get those bumped at some
> > point :)
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Fokko
> >
> >
> > Op di 3 dec 2024 om 22:30 schreef Honah J. <hon...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks for running the release, Kevin!
> > >
> > > - Verified signatures/checksum/license
> > > - Ran tests "make test-coverage" in python 3.11
> > >
> > > I noticed that when running tests with latest dependencies:
> > > - pandas==2.2.3
> > > - pyspark==3.5.4
> > > - getdaft==0.3.15
> > > some tests failed due to the following warnings:
> > >
> > > python3.11/site-packages/pandas/core/dtypes/common.py:335:
> > >> DeprecationWarning: is_datetime64tz_dtype is deprecated and will be
> removed
> > >> in a future version. Check `isinstance(dtype, pd.DatetimeTZDtype)`
> instead.
> > >
> > >
> > >  python3.11/site-packages/daft/runners/pyrunner.py:344: UserWarning:
> > >> PyRunner will be deprecated in v0.4.0 and the new NativeRunner will
> > >> become the default for local execution.We recommend switching to the
> > >> NativeRunner now via `daft.context.set_runner_native()` or by setting
> the
> > >> env variable `DAFT_RUNNER=native`. Please report any issues at
> > >> github.com/Eventual-Inc/Daft/issues
> > >
> > >
> > > Since these warnings are deprecation notices triggered by daft/pyspark
> > > internal code, I don't think they block the current rc.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Honah
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 5:37 PM Sung Yun <sungwy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Kevin,
> > >>
> > >> Yes, that approach sounds good to me as well. And thanks for the
> > >> explanation!
> > >>
> > >> Sung
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 8:17 PM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hey Sung,
> > >>>
> > >>> Good point. For context, I accidentally generated and uploaded to
> PyPi a
> > >>> version with `0.8.1` instead of `0.8.1rc1`. Fokko helped me yank that
> > >>> version. https://pypi.org/project/pyiceberg/0.8.1/
> > >>>
> > >>> If this RC passes, we can un-yank and reuse the currently uploaded
> > >>> version. Otherwise, I can create a new patch version using `0.8.2`.
> How
> > >>> does that sound?
> > >>>
> > >>> Additionally, I created a PR to prevent this from happening again.
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1386
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Kevin Liu
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 5:07 PM Sung Yun <sungwy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Kevin,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thank you so much for working on this release!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I noticed this morning that PyIceberg 0.8.1 was released and
> yanked[1]
> > >>>> this morning. Similar to how we had handled it when this had
> happened last
> > >>>> time, I think this would mean that we would need to now move on to
> the next
> > >>>> version and publish it as a PyIceberg 0.8.2 release instead. Hence,
> I think
> > >>>> it would make sense to start a new vote thread with the incremented
> version.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Sung
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] https://pypi.org/project/pyiceberg/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 7:55 PM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi Everyone,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official
> PyIceberg
> > >>>>> 0.8.1 release.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The commit ID is a051584a3684392d2db6556449eb299145d47d15
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: pyiceberg-0.8.1rc1
> > >>>>> (17124779c5294cb928f3807ed539f427f9b4bd2e)
> > >>>>> *
> > >>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/releases/tag/pyiceberg-0.8.1rc1
> > >>>>> *
> > >>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/tree/a051584a3684392d2db6556449eb299145d47d15
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> *
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/pyiceberg-0.8.1rc1/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> You can find the KEYS file here:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on pypi:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> https://pypi.org/project/pyiceberg/0.8.1rc1/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> And can be installed using: pip3 install pyiceberg==0.8.1rc1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> * https://py.iceberg.apache.org/verify-release/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> High-Level Summary
> > >>>>> *Breaking Changes*
> > >>>>> * The `Table.name` method now returns the table name *without the
> > >>>>> catalog name*, as part of a broader effort to remove catalog
> > >>>>> references in PyIceberg.
> > >>>>>   * Replace usages of `Table.identifier` with `Table.name` in the
> > >>>>> codebase
> > >>>>>   * Replace usages of the deprecated function
> > >>>>> (`identifier_to_tuple_without_catalog`) in the codebase which
> removes
> > >>>>> unnecessary warnings
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> *Bug fixes** Fix `add_files` for parquet files missing column
> > >>>>> statistics
> > >>>>> * Allow leading underscore in column name used in row filter
> > >>>>> * Ignore Glue and Hive tables missing the `table_type` property
> > >>>>> * Write `null` in manifest list metadata when there is no
> > >>>>> `parent-snapshot-id`
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> *Dependency Updates** Removed upper-bound restrictions on
> > >>>>> dependencies; allow early testing of new versions:
> > >>>>>   * Remove Python library version upper bound restriction; allow
> > >>>>> Python 3.13
> > >>>>>   * Remove fsspec library version upper bound restriction
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> *Documentation Updates** Improve “how to release” documentation
> > >>>>> * Included post-release steps for version 0.8.0
> > >>>>> * Included documentation updates in this patch release to reflect
> > >>>>> these changes in https://py.iceberg.apache.org/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> *Commit Summary*
> > >>>>> * [36 new commits since the `0.8.0` release](
> > >>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/compare/pyiceberg-0.8.0...acbd071375ac4cc2053435346737a3b1a64cce2e
> ).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> * 12 new commits will be included in 0.8.1
> > >>>>>   * 11 commits cherry-picked as bug fixes (listed below)
> > >>>>>   * 1 [commit](
> > >>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/commit/58389dfe5cf5f6ef6ea16c47cd11408c642fafd1
> )
> > >>>>> to bump version to `0.8.1`
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> *Detailed Commits*
> > >>>>> * acbd071 Write `null` when there is no parent-snapshot-id (#1383)
> > >>>>> * bb078cf Add instruction for patch release (#1373)
> > >>>>> * ab43c6c fix `KeyError` raised by `add_files` when parquet file
> doe
> > >>>>> not have column stats (#1354)
> > >>>>> * cc1ab2c Improve documentation for "how to release" (#1359)
> > >>>>> * 64dc6fe Remove Python 3.13 upper bound restriction (#1355)
> > >>>>> * d86ab6e Allow leading underscore in column name used in row
> filter
> > >>>>> (#1358)
> > >>>>> * 7a4734e Replace reference of `Table.identifier` with `Table.name`
> > >>>>> (#1346)
> > >>>>> * a66ddc0 Ignore tables without `table_type` from Glue and Hive
> (#1332)
> > >>>>> * 2cbc77d Drop upper bounds for fsspec and it's implementations
> (#1341)
> > >>>>> * 7660a5b 0.8.0 post release steps (#1334)
> > >>>>> * b2f0a9e use the non-deprecated func (#1326)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please download, verify, and test.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
> > >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as PyIceberg 0.8.1
> > >>>>> [ ] +0
> > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best,
> > >>>>> Kevin Liu
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> >
>

Reply via email to