+1 (non binding) I checked: - sign and hash are good (NB: sha256 is not required anymore, sha512 is enough) - LICENSE and NOTICE are OK - ASF header is present - no binary file found in the source distribution - build OK on my machine
Thanks ! Regards JB On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 8:20 PM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > RC 2 has been uploaded! Sorry about that! > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2024, 1:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Matt >> >> Can you please update the source distribution on dist.apache.org >> (https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/) ? >> It's still the RC1 here. >> From an ASF standpoint, that's the only strictly required artifact. >> >> Thanks ! >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 12:06 AM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC2) of Apache >> > Iceberg Go version v0.1.0. >> > >> > This release candidate is based on commit: >> > 0921b84b53e3184a1867481bf1e1a22f5a059b5c [1] >> > >> > The source release rc2 is hosted at [2]. >> > >> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests, and >> > vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate. >> > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> > >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg Go v0.1.0 >> > [ ] +0 >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Iceberg Go v0.1.0 because... >> > >> > Thanks! >> > --Matt >> > >> > [1]: >> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/commit/0921b84b53e3184a1867481bf1e1a22f5a059b5c >> > [2]: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/releases/v0.1.0-rc2 >> > [3]: >> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
