Hi Everyone,

As part of our discussions on the Materialized View (MV) spec, the topic of
"SQL table identifiers" has been a constant source of complexity. After
several iterations, the community has agreed not to use SQL table
identifiers in the table-side representation of MVs. However, that still
does not preclude referencing SQL table identifiers in views since they are
integral to view definitions. Therefore, it’s crucial to properly design
this aspect of the spec in order to improve the view spec as well as
unblock the progress on the MV spec.

I’ve outlined the current gaps in the view spec along with some proposed
ways to address them in this document [1]. It would be great to get your
feedback so we can simplify future discussions around views and
materialized views.

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.

[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e5orD_sBv0VlNNLZRgUtalVUllGuztnAGTtqo8J0UG8/edit

Thanks,
Walaa

Reply via email to