Hi Russel, I am not sure if materialized views change the table spec. Table spec remains largely the same when it comes to handling MVs. Further, I think there may be unresolved questions on the view part before proceeding with the MV spec (namely on catalog names).
There is also a PR on default values: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9502 which should be part of V3. Thanks, Walaa. On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 9:52 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi y’all! > > I’m excited to say that we have a lot of great Iceberg V3 Spec PR’s out > right now. V3 Looks like it’s going to be awesome! > > A reminder if you haven’t had a chance yet to check them out: > > Row Lineage > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11130>Materialized Views > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11041>Geometric Types > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10981>Type Promotion and Variant > Type > > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10955>I’m hoping we can get > consensus on all of these ASAP so we can start working more on > implementations and getting closer to the Iceberg 1.7 release (not that > these are blockers I’m just hoping we can have some functionality ready.) > So if you are interested in any of these please check them out and add any > comments if you have any or just leave a note saying you are in on board. > > I also know we should have one additional PR for the new Delete File spec > changes coming soon! > > Thanks everyone for your time, > Russ >
