+1 I am on board, all of my doubts are resolved On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:42 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi Anton > > Sorry for the late reply on this proposal. > I like it ! It looks good to me (I have a few minor comments). > > It would be great to include this spec update in V3. > Please let me know if I can help on this ! > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 11:28 PM Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnyc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hey folks, > > > > As discussed during the sync, I've been working on a proposal to improve > the handling of position deletes in V3. It builds on lessons learned from > deploying the current approach at scale and addresses all unresolved > questions from past community discussions and proposals around this topic. > > > > In particular, the proposal attempts to address the following > shortcomings we observe today: > > > > Choosing between fewer delete files on disk or targeted deletes. > > Dependence on external maintenance for consistent write and read > performance. > > Writing and reading overhead as in-memory and on-disk representations > differ. > > > > Please, take a look at the doc [1] and let me know what you think. Any > feedback is highly appreciated! > > > > - Anton > > > > [1] - > https://docs.google.com/document/d/18Bqhr-vnzFfQk1S4AgRISkA_5_m5m32Nnc2Cw0zn2XM > > > > >
