Anton,

Thanks for the write-up. It's very entertaining to read. I left some minor
comments on the doc. +1 to the proposal.

Regards,
Manu

On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 7:21 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Anton,
>
> Thanks a lot for the improvement proposal and great write-up with
> quantitative supporting arguments.
>
> +1 from my side.
>
> Thanks,
> Steven
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 2:29 PM Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnyc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> As discussed during the sync, I've been working on a proposal to improve
>> the handling of position deletes in V3. It builds on lessons learned from
>> deploying the current approach at scale and addresses all unresolved
>> questions from past community discussions and proposals around this topic.
>>
>> In particular, the proposal attempts to address the following
>> shortcomings we observe today:
>>
>>    - Choosing between fewer delete files on disk or targeted deletes.
>>    - Dependence on external maintenance for consistent write and read
>>    performance.
>>    - Writing and reading overhead as in-memory and on-disk
>>    representations differ.
>>
>> Please, take a look at the doc [1] and let me know what you think. Any
>> feedback is highly appreciated!
>>
>> - Anton
>>
>> [1] -
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18Bqhr-vnzFfQk1S4AgRISkA_5_m5m32Nnc2Cw0zn2XM
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to