+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 1:22 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > I think it would be good to give an overview of the current proposal since > it has evolved quite a bit from the original like Jack said. > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:09 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for keeping pushing for this Rahil. Personally I am +1 (binding) >> for this, with just some minor comments in the latest PR. >> >> But I think the initial DISCUSS thread [1] was quite a while ago and a >> lot has changed after a lot of comments and reviews. Should we restart >> another DISCUSS thread before voting, to make sure people are aware of the >> latest design and address any additional comments? >> >> Best, >> Jack Ye >> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/qq13468x6gk0vxnsckzc5xd02tjlvpkm >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 9:22 PM Chertara, Rahil >> <rcher...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> >>> I've opened a PR [1] to add REST spec changes for a new protocol around >>> table scan planning. For context around the design discussions, see the >>> original google doc proposal [2], the dev list discussion thread [3], and >>> finally the discussion that has happened on the spec change PR. >>> >>> >>> >>> Please vote on merging this change. The vote will remain open for at >>> least 72 hours. >>> >>> >>> >>> [] +1 >>> >>> [] +0 >>> >>> [] -1, do not merge because ... >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9695 >>> >>> [2] >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FdjCnFZM1fNtgyb9-v9fU4FwOX4An-pqEwSaJe8RgUg/edit#heading=h.cftjlkb2wh4h >>> >>> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/qq13468x6gk0vxnsckzc5xd02tjlvpkm >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Rahil Chertara >>> >>
