Thanks Rahil for driving this and everyone for reviewing! Merged the PR.

Thanks,

Amogh Jahagirdar

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 8:24 AM Chertara, Rahil <rcher...@amazon.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Thanks all for reviewing the pr. With 4 binding and 1 non-binding votes,
> the vote has passed. Can a maintainer please merge the pr when they get a
> chance?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rahil Chertara
>
>
>
> *From: *Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org>
> *Reply-To: *"dev@iceberg.apache.org" <dev@iceberg.apache.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, September 5, 2024 at 8:59 AM
> *To: *"dev@iceberg.apache.org" <dev@iceberg.apache.org>
> *Subject: *RE: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] Merge REST Spec Change To Add New Scan
> Planning APIs
>
>
>
> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 1:22 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>
> I think it would be good to give an overview of the current proposal since
> it has evolved quite a bit from the original like Jack said.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:09 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for keeping pushing for this Rahil. Personally I am +1 (binding)
> for this, with just some minor comments in the latest PR.
>
>
>
> But I think the initial DISCUSS thread [1] was quite a while ago and a lot
> has changed after a lot of comments and reviews. Should we restart another
> DISCUSS thread before voting, to make sure people are aware of the latest
> design and address any additional comments?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Jack Ye
>
>
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/qq13468x6gk0vxnsckzc5xd02tjlvpkm
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 9:22 PM Chertara, Rahil <rcher...@amazon.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I've opened a PR [1] to add REST spec changes for a new protocol around
> table scan planning. For context around the design discussions, see the
> original google doc proposal [2], the dev list discussion thread [3], and
> finally the discussion that has happened on the spec change PR.
>
>
>
> Please vote on merging this change. The vote will remain open for at least
> 72 hours.
>
>
>
> [] +1
>
> [] +0
>
> [] -1, do not merge because ...
>
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9695
>
> [2]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FdjCnFZM1fNtgyb9-v9fU4FwOX4An-pqEwSaJe8RgUg/edit#heading=h.cftjlkb2wh4h
>
> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/qq13468x6gk0vxnsckzc5xd02tjlvpkm
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rahil Chertara
>
>

Reply via email to