I think it's reasonable to link to the other channels. We want to raise
awareness of this content, just not get involved in moderation.

On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 11:11 AM Jonathan Leang <leangjonat...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks everyone for the time and input. Kevin and I will just run this off
> our own YouTube channel as suggested.
> https://www.youtube.com/@IcebergMeetup
>
> Ryan, appreciate the candor and I understand the nuance here. To fully
> button up this conversation, can you suggest if we should link the above
> channel and/or curate a playlist for the meetups in the official channel?
>
> - Jonathan
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 4:25 PM Ryan Blue <b...@databricks.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> I definitely prefer not posting videos from an official channel unless
>> they are from some official event, for the same reason that I don't think
>> it is a good idea to publish blog posts. We don't want the PMC to become
>> moderators of what can or can't go there, even if it seems easy to make a
>> choice right now. And we don't want to take responsibility for whatever is
>> said in this channel.
>>
>> There are lots of things that could go wrong, even in this case and even
>> if people are trying to do the right thing. For instance, what if one of
>> the talks (not curated by the community) presents a benchmark favoring one
>> vendor over another? Do we want it to look like the community is promoting
>> it as credible? What if a vendor asks for it to be taken down? Do we want
>> to form an opinion about whether that benchmark is fair and accurate?
>>
>> I just think this opens us up to high tension situations that could
>> distract and slow down what we're working on. And there isn't a very clear
>> benefit to that risk. If this uses a separate youtube channel, what is the
>> downside?
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 2:07 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for option 3, to publish meetup videos under the Apache Iceberg
>>> YouTube channel in a new playlist.
>>>
>>> We normally trust people to do the right thing. That's how the community
>>> thrives. But in case any video violates ASF trademark guidelines, we can
>>> still take it down as Jack suggested.
>>>
>>> Yufei
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 12:07 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was able to find the following 2 seemingly official channels (please
>>>> confirm if possible):
>>>> - Apache Beam: https://www.youtube.com/@ApacheBeamYT
>>>> - Apache Airflow: https://www.youtube.com/@ApacheAirflow
>>>>
>>>> Personally speaking I am fine either way. The 2 channels above have all
>>>> sorts of talks, meetup recordings out there, so I am not particularly
>>>> concerned about vendor endorsement. If there are contents that are clearly
>>>> vendor marketing material, people will probably flag that anyway and the
>>>> PMC can put it down. But on the other hand, I can also see where Ryan is
>>>> coming from given that vendor neutrality is a critical aspect of this
>>>> project and it's good that we think this through.
>>>>
>>>> I will leave this to people who have concerns, previous experience or
>>>> know more about the related ASF guidelines to comment here.
>>>>
>>>> -Jack
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 11:56 AM Jonathan Leang <
>>>> leangjonat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Floating this up again since we haven't gotten any movement on the
>>>>> thread. I couldn't find anything like an "official" YouTube or other socal
>>>>> for other ASF projects so AFAIK we are doing something a bit different
>>>>> (which is super cool btw).
>>>>>
>>>>> From looking through the existing YouTube channel for Iceberg, there
>>>>> are three playlists: Iceberg Talks, Iceberg Tutorials, and Iceberg
>>>>> Community Syncs. Iceberg Community Syncs are just that. Iceberg Talks and
>>>>> Iceberg Tutorials seem like they are mostly from vendors. Iceberg Talks
>>>>> specifically has the description "Conferences, Meetups, and any talk
>>>>> happening in the Iceberg Community".
>>>>>
>>>>> The meetups we want to post have been run in such a way that they are
>>>>> vendor agnostic. We've even come up with guidelines for this
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y87k-8nCMczzORIcsePDu6CWTTO0h9qI67W_go8BmPA
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> There are a few ways I've thought of for us to post these talks:
>>>>> 1. We publish under a different YouTube channel and that's it
>>>>> 2. We publish under a different YouTube channel and the Apache Iceberg
>>>>> YouTube can curate a new playlist of the videos posted
>>>>> 3. We publish under the Apache Iceberg YouTube channel in a new
>>>>> playlist
>>>>>
>>>>> IMO #3 would be good so we can publish under the same roof and not
>>>>> have community-led videos fractured over multiple accounts. Ryan, Jack, or
>>>>> anyone else with some thoughts on this?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Jonathan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:51 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Can people share what other projects do? And are there any related
>>>>>> ASF guidelines out there about this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Jack
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Jack
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024, 3:57 PM Ryan Blue <b...@databricks.com.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I didn't realize that the account was curating playlists. I'm trying
>>>>>>> to draw a parallel with the blog post example. Do we consider playlists
>>>>>>> links? I guess the question is whether it looks official. Would 
>>>>>>> inclusion
>>>>>>> in a playlist be mistaken for an endorsement? Or would we get into
>>>>>>> unnecessary debates over what is appropriate for inclusion in a 
>>>>>>> playlist?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 3:39 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Looking at https://www.youtube.com/@ApacheIceberg/playlists, there
>>>>>>>> are also many other talks and even tutorials, what about those?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Jack
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 2:45 PM Brian Olsen <
>>>>>>>> bitsondata...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Update: I moved the video and playlist to a Private status until
>>>>>>>>> this is discussed. In the meantime, we'll wait to hear some guidance 
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> the PMC and community to advise. Otherwise, I suggest that Jonathan 
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> Kevin create an unofficial community Apache Iceberg Meetups channel 
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> follows the trademark guidelines:
>>>>>>>>> https://apache.org/foundation/marks/ but have asked them to give
>>>>>>>>> some time to let others respond.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks all!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 4:41 PM Brian Olsen <
>>>>>>>>> bitsondata...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hey Ryan,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I will take that down, apologies for that confusion. I remember
>>>>>>>>>> having some discussion around this before and my recollection was 
>>>>>>>>>> this was
>>>>>>>>>> more of a concern about vendor content but after I read your reply I
>>>>>>>>>> remembered this was a more general ASF sentiment. So with that, I 
>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>> think distributing these through various channels would be valuable, 
>>>>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>>>>> exposing them through playlists. For example, we added the Data 
>>>>>>>>>> Council
>>>>>>>>>> talk you gave a while back where the video is hosted on Data 
>>>>>>>>>> Council's
>>>>>>>>>> channel, but we've added it to the "Iceberg Talks Playlist".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps this would be a matter of having the PMC create some
>>>>>>>>>> guidance on certain playlists like the meetups playlist I just 
>>>>>>>>>> created and
>>>>>>>>>> then I can add videos from other channels that say Kevin and others 
>>>>>>>>>> own to
>>>>>>>>>> upload Iceberg meetups and we can push visibility to certain videos 
>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>> their channels that meet the criteria (like avoiding talks that are 
>>>>>>>>>> pushing
>>>>>>>>>> a particular vendor or product for example). Would this align more 
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> what you have in mind to avoid endorsements?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 3:59 PM Ryan Blue
>>>>>>>>>> <b...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I strongly prefer not posting meetup videos on an official
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Iceberg channel.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's why we have up until now used the channel only for
>>>>>>>>>>> videos from sanctioned Iceberg events
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/@ApacheIceberg/videos>, like community
>>>>>>>>>>> syncs or the Apache Iceberg Summit. I wasn't aware that Bits posted 
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> last Seattle meetup video.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> An "official" distribution channel like this (one controlled by
>>>>>>>>>>> the Iceberg PMC) needs to be careful about posting content because 
>>>>>>>>>>> it can
>>>>>>>>>>> be seen as an endorsement and there are reasonable objections around
>>>>>>>>>>> posting some videos (for instance, they are strongly biased to a 
>>>>>>>>>>> particular
>>>>>>>>>>> solution or vendor). I don't want the PMC to be in the business of 
>>>>>>>>>>> deciding
>>>>>>>>>>> what gets to be on the official channel or not -- that's a whole 
>>>>>>>>>>> set of
>>>>>>>>>>> arguments that I think we want to steer clear of. This is also the 
>>>>>>>>>>> reason
>>>>>>>>>>> why the Iceberg site doesn't host blog posts, by the way. We 
>>>>>>>>>>> originally had
>>>>>>>>>>> requests for people to post articles, but I don't think it is wise 
>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>> project to decide what opinions can be posted there.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think that we should remove the last meetup video and only
>>>>>>>>>>> post content like the community sync videos. For everything else, I 
>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>> it is a good idea to have a separate channel. We can link to those 
>>>>>>>>>>> channels
>>>>>>>>>>> to make them easy to find, but we don't want to be in the middle 
>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>> someone has an opinion about what should or should not be posted 
>>>>>>>>>>> and should
>>>>>>>>>>> not be seen as endorsing any particular solutions.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 1:44 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> > posting/content management privileges to the Iceberg YouTube
>>>>>>>>>>>> channel for these meetup recordings
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This sounds reasonable to me, when the meetup is recurring. So
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am good with doing this for the Seattle meetup series. We have
>>>>>>>>>>>> technically already done so for Bits for the community sync 
>>>>>>>>>>>> meeting series.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Jack
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 1:23 PM Jonathan Leang <
>>>>>>>>>>>> leangjonat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a question related to some questions about shared
>>>>>>>>>>>>> administration of Apache Iceberg social/marketing channels such 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as YouTube
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in this specific instance. Kevin Liu and I have organized the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> first Seattle
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Iceberg meetups and it looks like there will be a steady stream of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical talks about things like proposals and more generally 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> recent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> developments in the project. Bits (Brian Olsen) helped us get the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>>>>>>>> recent meetup posted on the Apache Iceberg YouTube channel but 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we're hoping
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not to bother him every month. We're wondering if Kevin and/or I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can get
>>>>>>>>>>>>> posting/content management privileges to the Iceberg YouTube 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> channel for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> these meetup recordings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We asked Bits and he replied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be good to have some trusted people + PMC coordinate
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the social + marketing channels. In many projects I either see 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> nobody
>>>>>>>>>>>>> really owning it and it becomes abandoned over time and other 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> times I see
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it primarily run through one or two companies or individuals 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> scale. It would be great if a small group of trusted volunteers 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> comanage
>>>>>>>>>>>>> these marketing channels with similar guidelines on how to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinate when,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> channel "voice", and following standard ASF COC guidelines, etc...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps Bits and/or a PMC member could take on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsibility of building out the guidance on how to run this 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> without too
>>>>>>>>>>>>> much overlap or interference as it scales out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan Leang
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>>>>>>> Databricks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>>> Databricks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Blue
>> Databricks
>>
>

-- 
Ryan Blue
Databricks

Reply via email to