+1, looking forward to see it in action, would 3 months be a good evaluation window for rest of the iceberg repo?
Thanks, Steve Zhang > On Jul 11, 2024, at 9:52 AM, Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1. It is a no-brainer to me given it is more search-engine friendly compared > to slack and email. It won't have the retention issue from Slack as well. I'd > like to see it on other Iceberg repos as well. > > Yufei > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 3:01 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com > <mailto:yezhao...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> +1 for enabling it on iceberg-rust first. >> >> I am curious how search-engine friendly this is, that will be a huge plus if >> people can find these discussion contents. For people who have used it more >> like Piotr, do you know about this? I search Trino things quite a lot on >> Google, but rarely did I find GitHub discussion links popping up. >> >> -Jack >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 9:05 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com >> <mailto:russell.spit...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> I'm a fan of having more things on github if possible. I haven't used this >>> feature but it sounds like it could be useful. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 6:15 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:liurenjie2...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> I’m fine with enabling it in iceberg-rust first and see how it goes. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 17:39 Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org >>>> <mailto:fo...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>> Thanks for raising this. I would also prefer discussions over a user >>>>> mailing-list since it has a lower barrier. We could also first enable >>>>> this on Iceberg-rust and evaluate it after a while to see the added value >>>>> and then decide for Python and Java? WDYT? >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> Fokko >>>>> >>>>> Op wo 10 jul 2024 om 10:14 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>: >>>>>> Yes and no :) >>>>>> >>>>>> It's a beta feature. My point is that we can enabled GitHub Discussion >>>>>> easily, and depending of the timing, asf.yaml support will be added. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 7:49 AM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org >>>>>> <mailto:xua...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Hi, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > Regarding the discussion tab, it sounds good to me. It's pretty >>>>>> > straight forward to do by editing .asf.yaml. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I tried this before. But the asf.yaml doesn't support controling >>>>>> > discussion yet. >>>>>> > We need the help from infra team. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=INFRA&title=git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-GitHubDiscussions >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 13:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>> > > Hi >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > It's also possible to create a user mailing list if it helps. >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Regarding the discussion tab, it sounds good to me. It's pretty >>>>>> > > straight forward to do by editing .asf.yaml. >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Regards >>>>>> > > JB >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 5:18 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com >>>>>> > > <mailto:liurenjie2...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> Hi: >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> Recently we have observed more and more user interested in >>>>>> > >> iceberg-rust, and they have many questions about it, for example >>>>>> > >> the status, relationship with others such pyiceberg. Slack is a >>>>>> > >> great place to discussion, but is not friendly for long discussion >>>>>> > >> and not easy to comment. We can also encourage user to use github >>>>>> > >> issue, but it's easy to mix with true issues, e.g. feature >>>>>> > >> tracking, bug tracking, etc. >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> So I propose to enable the discussion tab for repos of iceberg and >>>>>> > >> subprojects such as iceberg-rust, pyiceberg, iceberg-go. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > -- >>>>>> > Xuanwo >>>>>> > >>>>>> > https://xuanwo.io/
