+1 for enabling it on iceberg-rust first. I am curious how search-engine friendly this is, that will be a huge plus if people can find these discussion contents. For people who have used it more like Piotr, do you know about this? I search Trino things quite a lot on Google, but rarely did I find GitHub discussion links popping up.
-Jack On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 9:05 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm a fan of having more things on github if possible. I haven't used this > feature but it sounds like it could be useful. > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 6:15 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I’m fine with enabling it in iceberg-rust first and see how it goes. >> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 17:39 Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for raising this. I would also prefer discussions over a user >>> mailing-list since it has a lower barrier. We could also first enable this >>> on Iceberg-rust and evaluate it after a while to see the added value and >>> then decide for Python and Java? WDYT? >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Fokko >>> >>> Op wo 10 jul 2024 om 10:14 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net >>> >: >>> >>>> Yes and no :) >>>> >>>> It's a beta feature. My point is that we can enabled GitHub Discussion >>>> easily, and depending of the timing, asf.yaml support will be added. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 7:49 AM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hi, >>>> > >>>> > > Regarding the discussion tab, it sounds good to me. It's pretty >>>> > straight forward to do by editing .asf.yaml. >>>> > >>>> > I tried this before. But the asf.yaml doesn't support controling >>>> discussion yet. >>>> > We need the help from infra team. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=INFRA&title=git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-GitHubDiscussions >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 13:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>> > > Hi >>>> > > >>>> > > It's also possible to create a user mailing list if it helps. >>>> > > >>>> > > Regarding the discussion tab, it sounds good to me. It's pretty >>>> > > straight forward to do by editing .asf.yaml. >>>> > > >>>> > > Regards >>>> > > JB >>>> > > >>>> > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 5:18 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Hi: >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Recently we have observed more and more user interested in >>>> iceberg-rust, and they have many questions about it, for example the >>>> status, relationship with others such pyiceberg. Slack is a great place to >>>> discussion, but is not friendly for long discussion and not easy to >>>> comment. We can also encourage user to use github issue, but it's easy to >>>> mix with true issues, e.g. feature tracking, bug tracking, etc. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> So I propose to enable the discussion tab for repos of iceberg >>>> and subprojects such as iceberg-rust, pyiceberg, iceberg-go. >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Xuanwo >>>> > >>>> > https://xuanwo.io/ >>>> >>>
