I'm a fan of having more things on github if possible. I haven't used this
feature but it sounds like it could be useful.

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 6:15 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I’m fine with enabling it in iceberg-rust first and see how it goes.
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 17:39 Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for raising this. I would also prefer discussions over a user
>> mailing-list since it has a lower barrier. We could also first enable this
>> on Iceberg-rust and evaluate it after a while to see the added value and
>> then decide for Python and Java? WDYT?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Fokko
>>
>> Op wo 10 jul 2024 om 10:14 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
>> >:
>>
>>> Yes and no :)
>>>
>>> It's a beta feature. My point is that we can enabled GitHub Discussion
>>> easily, and depending of the timing, asf.yaml support will be added.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 7:49 AM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > > Regarding the discussion tab, it sounds good to me. It's pretty
>>> > straight forward to do by editing .asf.yaml.
>>> >
>>> > I tried this before. But the asf.yaml doesn't support controling
>>> discussion yet.
>>> > We need the help from infra team.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=INFRA&title=git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-GitHubDiscussions
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 13:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> > > Hi
>>> > >
>>> > > It's also possible to create a user mailing list if it helps.
>>> > >
>>> > > Regarding the discussion tab, it sounds good to me. It's pretty
>>> > > straight forward to do by editing .asf.yaml.
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards
>>> > > JB
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 5:18 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Hi:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Recently we have observed more and more user interested in
>>> iceberg-rust, and they have many questions about it, for example the
>>> status, relationship with others such pyiceberg. Slack is a great place to
>>> discussion, but is not friendly for long discussion and not easy to
>>> comment. We can also encourage user to use github issue, but it's easy to
>>> mix with true issues, e.g. feature tracking, bug tracking, etc.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> So I propose to enable the discussion tab for  repos of iceberg and
>>> subprojects such as iceberg-rust, pyiceberg, iceberg-go.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Xuanwo
>>> >
>>> > https://xuanwo.io/
>>>
>>

Reply via email to