I don't think we need to revert a deprecation. Deprecation gives people time to move off of something that won't be supported in the future and it doesn't make sense to me to delay letting people know that.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:34 PM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like Salesforce is using the DynamoDB catalog in production. > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9783#issuecomment-1965781361 > > They can provide more details. > > How about *reverting* the Deprecation for 1.5.0 release? > If finally concluded to be deprecated, can we deprecate it in 1.6.0? > I just don't want the upcoming RC4 to fail because of this and do RC5 just > for it. > > - Ajantha > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:44 AM Drew <img...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey everyone, >> >> Since it seems like we have met a consensus here, I can pick up the >> deprecation of DynamoDbCatalog. I submitted a PR that marks the catalog as >> deprecated and schedules it for complete removal in two releases starting >> with 1.6.0. >> >> Pr: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9783 >> >> Thanks, >> Drew >> >> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 5:24 PM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 for deprecation and removal by 2.0 version. >>> >>> - Ajantha >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 4:23 AM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 as well for deprecation >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 1:08 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Perfect ! Thanks ! >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 7:18 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks for the feedback JB! Yes, I was originally intended to use >>>>> this thread to collect any concern of us flagging this catalog as >>>>> deprecated. >>>>> > >>>>> > If I don't receive any objection in the next 5 days, I will go ahead >>>>> to do that, and let the default 2 release full deprecation window apply. >>>>> And I will revive this thread again to double check when we plan to remove >>>>> it after 2 releases. >>>>> > >>>>> > Best, >>>>> > Jack Ye >>>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:33 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Hi Jack, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> If we have a very low number of users and propose they move to >>>>> another >>>>> >> catalog, that makes sense to me. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I think we can first flag DynamodbCatalog as deprecated (providing a >>>>> >> message to the community and give time for users to move forward), >>>>> >> then we can plan a vote later to remove it. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Regards >>>>> >> JB >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 7:11 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Hi everyone, >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > As discussed in community sync, I am raising a thread about >>>>> potentially deprecating DynamodbCatalog. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > I added it back in the day because of some customer collaboration >>>>> effort. Later another implementation was also added in pybut at this point >>>>> the specific customer has forked the implementation and is maintaining >>>>> their own catalog. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Please comment if you have any production dependency or have any >>>>> concern about deprecating for this catalog, and we can discuss the path >>>>> forward. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Best, >>>>> >> > Jack Ye >>>>> >>>> -- Ryan Blue Tabular
