+1 as well for deprecation On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 1:08 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Perfect ! Thanks ! > > Regards > JB > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 7:18 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the feedback JB! Yes, I was originally intended to use this > thread to collect any concern of us flagging this catalog as deprecated. > > > > If I don't receive any objection in the next 5 days, I will go ahead to > do that, and let the default 2 release full deprecation window apply. And I > will revive this thread again to double check when we plan to remove it > after 2 releases. > > > > Best, > > Jack Ye > > > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:33 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Jack, > >> > >> If we have a very low number of users and propose they move to another > >> catalog, that makes sense to me. > >> > >> I think we can first flag DynamodbCatalog as deprecated (providing a > >> message to the community and give time for users to move forward), > >> then we can plan a vote later to remove it. > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 7:11 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi everyone, > >> > > >> > As discussed in community sync, I am raising a thread about > potentially deprecating DynamodbCatalog. > >> > > >> > I added it back in the day because of some customer collaboration > effort. Later another implementation was also added in pybut at this point > the specific customer has forked the implementation and is maintaining > their own catalog. > >> > > >> > Please comment if you have any production dependency or have any > concern about deprecating for this catalog, and we can discuss the path > forward. > >> > > >> > Best, > >> > Jack Ye >
