Hi, Jan:
Thanks for the proposal. I’ve scanned the doc and left some comments. There are many interesting topics about materialized view, such as incremental mv maintenance, view matching problem. It would be great if the iceberg can support materialized view definition. On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:27 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi Jan > > Thanks for the reminder. I will take a look. > > As proposed by Renjie a few days ago, it would be great to > gather/store all document proposals in a central place. > > If there are no objections, I will prepare a PR for the website about > that (with a space listing/linking all proposals). > > Regards > JB > > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 9:22 AM Jan Kaul <jank...@mailbox.org.invalid> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I've created an issue to propose a design for a Materialized View Spec a > while ago. After further discussion we reached a first draft for the spec. > It would be great if you could have another look at the design and share > your feedback. > > > > Here is the google doc: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UnhldHhe3Grz8JBngwXPA6ZZord1xMedY5ukEhZYF-A/edit?usp=sharing > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Jan >
