> You can see it’s what I mentioned in my vote email. However, as it’s like > this for a while, I voted +1 and I have PRs ready to be submitted (including > rat execution). > > So do you think it’s blocking ?
Thanks for the clarification. I'm voting -1 due to the reasons mentioned, but it doesn't block this release (especially since it's non-binding). This release can proceed once it garners enough +1 votes. My -1 vote is simply to highlight areas we could improve in future releases. On Thu, Oct 19, 2023, at 13:11, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi > > You can see it’s what I mentioned in my vote email. However, as it’s like > this for a while, I voted +1 and I have PRs ready to be submitted (including > rat execution). > > So do you think it’s blocking ? > > Regards > JB > > Le mer. 18 oct. 2023 à 16:27, Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org> a écrit : >> __ >> -1 (non-binding) >> >> - checksum and signature is good >> >> - the following files not have license >> - .baseline/idea/intellij-java-palantir-style.xml >> - .baseline/checkstyle/checkstyle.xml >> - gradle/libs.versions.toml >> - .baseline/checkstyle/checkstyle-suppressions.xml >> - .baseline/checkstyle/checkstyle-suppressions.xml >> >> - release contains binary files >> - >> core/src/test/resources/org/apache/iceberg/puffin/v1/empty-puffin-uncompressed.bin >> - >> core/src/test/resources/org/apache/iceberg/puffin/v1/sample-metric-data-compressed-zstd.bin >> - >> core/src/test/resources/org/apache/iceberg/puffin/v1/sample-metric-data-uncompressed.bin >> >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, at 21:55, Eduard Tudenhoefner wrote: >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> * validated checksum and signature >>> * checked license docs & ran RAT checks >>> * ran build and tests with JDK8 >>> * ran into one test failure, which is reported in >>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8824, but this shouldn't block the >>> release >>> * tested with Trino in https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/19434 >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 3:15 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> wrote: >>>> +1 (non binding) >>>> >>>> I checked: >>>> * hashes and signatures are OK >>>> * I did quick tests using spark 3.5 >>>> >>>> I found the following issues that we should fix: >>>> * the source distribution contains two binary files (used for tests, >>>> empty-puffin-uncompressed.bin and sample-metric-data-uncompressed.bin). >>>> Binary files should not be included in the source distribution. >>>> * some files don't contain ASF header >>>> >>>> I will work to fix these issues, and also, I will propose to include rat >>>> to test our distribution. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:15 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner <edu...@tabular.io> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache Iceberg >>>>> 1.4.1 release. >>>>> >>>>> The commit ID is 445664fb8d82950215872cbfec91e37c5fa0920f >>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.4.1-rc0 >>>>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.4.1-rc0 >>>>> * >>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/445664fb8d82950215872cbfec91e37c5fa0920f >>>>> >>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>> * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.4.1-rc0 >>>>> >>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>> * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS >>>>> >>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository >>>>> URL is: >>>>> * >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1147/ >>>>> >>>>> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>> >>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.4.1 >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>> >>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are >>>>> encouraged to cast >>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 votes >>>>> and more binding >>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>>> >>>>> >> >> Xuanwo >> Xuanwo