+1 (non binding) I checked: - hash and signature are good - source distribution is good - run a quick test locally
Thanks, Regards JB On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:28 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg 0.5.1 > release. > > > This is a patch release due to a bug that has been found. Smaller bugs also > have been backported. > > > The commit ID is ea9da8856a686eaeda0d5c2be78d5e3102b67c44 > > > * This corresponds to the tag: pyiceberg-0.5.1rc1 > (320b0f499d14178210c3b9cb7d94dab1e1b149e6) > > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/releases/tag/pyiceberg-0.5.1rc1 > > * > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/tree/ea9da8856a686eaeda0d5c2be78d5e3102b67c44 > > > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: > > > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/pyiceberg-0.5.1rc1/ > > > You can find the KEYS file here: > > > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS > > > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on pypi: > > > https://pypi.org/project/pyiceberg/0.5.1rc1/ > > > And can be installed using: pip3 install pyiceberg==0.5.1rc1 > > > Please download, verify, and test. > > > Please vote in the next 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Release this as PyIceberg 0.5.1 > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 Do not release this because... > > > Kind regards, > > Fokko
