Thanks for doing this. I wonder how do we deal with all the issues filed for python module but still open in iceberg repo?
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 7:55 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner <edu...@tabular.io> wrote: > +1 on moving to a separate repo and maintaining git history > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 3:30 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> Awesome, it looks even better ;) >> >> Thanks ! >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 2:31 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hey Ajantha, >> > >> > That's a great suggestion. I've followed the steps and created a new PR >> here: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/3 >> > >> > The subdirectory-filter command moves a subdirectory to the root >> directory. This way I still had to add some files afterward (.github/*, >> .gitignore, etc.), these are in a separate commit. Please take a look. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Fokko >> > >> > Op vr 29 sep 2023 om 13:39 schreef Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com >> >: >> >> >> >> I think we are gonna lose the history of commits if we merge the above >> PR. >> >> >> >> There are ways to move the subfolder into a new repo by retaining >> commit history. >> >> For example: >> >> - >> https://medium.com/@ayushya/move-directory-from-one-repository-to-another-preserving-git-history-d210fa049d4b >> >> - https://gist.github.com/trongthanh/2779392 >> >> >> >> Please give it a try. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ajantha >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 4:55 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hey everyone 👋 >> >>> >> >>> A while ago we discussed that Rust and Go are going into a separate >> repository: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/4s02lmwf1kyrxxdpj3q9w2fqnxq2llbn >> >>> >> >>> Since we just did the PyIcerg 0.5.0 release, I think it is a good >> moment to migrate PyIceberg to iceberg-python as well: >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/2 I went over the PRs that >> are ready to merge and got them in. If there is anything missing, please >> let me know. >> >>> >> >>> I would suggest merging the PR and leaving the source code in the >> main repository for another week or so to make sure that we didn't miss >> anything. >> >>> >> >>> Since PyIceberg now also hosts the docs on the Github pages of the >> Iceberg repository, moving PyIceberg will also free up the Github pages for >> the migration of the docs back into the main repository. >> >>> >> >>> Let me know if there are any concerns. >> >>> >> >>> Kind regards, >> >>> Fokko Driesprong >> >
