BTW, spark 3.5 released: https://spark.apache.org/releases/spark-release-3-5-0.html
From: Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 10:03 To: dev@iceberg.apache.org <dev@iceberg.apache.org>, aokolnyc...@apple.com.invalid <aokolnyc...@apple.com.invalid> Cc: Iceberg Dev List <dev@iceberg.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Include Spark 3.5 support in 1.4? +1 for having a regular release pace clearly defined. This helps to increase adoption in industry. From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> Date: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 16:22 To: aokolnyc...@apple.com.invalid <aokolnyc...@apple.com.invalid> Cc: Iceberg Dev List <dev@iceberg.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Include Spark 3.5 support in 1.4? Hi Anton, I think we can increase our release pace (I'm volunteer to deal with releases if it helps). For 1.4, I'm working on removing the deprecated API in AwsProperties (the PR should be there pretty soon). Imho, it would be great to have a regular release pace clearly defined on the website for the community (I do that on several Apache projects), but nothing prevent us to do some fast release when needed. So we can imagine to submit 1.4.1 release to vote, including Spark 3.5. Thoughts ? Regards JB On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 1:28 AM Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnyc...@apple.com.invalid> wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > I have been one of the supporters for releasing Java 1.4 end of Aug or early > Sep. I think we are getting close and most of the targeted items will be > wrapped within one or two weeks. > > I just realized that Spark 3.5 is almost out. A few release candidates failed > but it is converging. How would everyone feel about targeting Spark 3.5 > support with our Java 1.4 release? I can add that support fairly quickly > cause we already consume the 3.5 APIs and adapted the tests internally. I > think that would be a good idea cause there is no critical items to deliver > in 1.4 as of now and it would be really unfortunate to wait for 2-3 more > months for Spark 3.5 support if we don’t include it now. > > Any thoughts? Does anyone need 1.4 asap? > > - Anton