+1 for including #7273. Thanks for pointing that out, Amogh! I also agree with Dan about the changes in #7153. That isn't fixing a regression or bug, and I think the changes are a bit too risky for a patch release.
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 10:29 AM Jahagirdar, Amogh <jaham...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote: > Hey Daniel, thanks for starting this thread. > > > > I think we would want to include > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7273/files in a 1.2.1 release. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Amogh Jahagirdar > > > > *From: *Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> > *Reply-To: *"dev@iceberg.apache.org" <dev@iceberg.apache.org> > *Date: *Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 9:08 PM > *To: *Iceberg Dev List <dev@iceberg.apache.org> > *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg Release 1.2.1 > > > > *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know > the content is safe. > > > > Hey Iceberg Community, > > > > I wanted to start a discussion around a patch release for 1.2.0 after a > number of small issues have been found that impact features of the current > release. > > > > I've created a milestone <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/31> to > track issues related to the patch release. > > > > If there are any issues that have been identified that should be included, > please reply to this email so that we can discuss their inclusion. > > > > If anyone is interested in volunteering to be release manager, let me know. > > > Thanks, > > Dan > -- Ryan Blue Tabular
