Since there were test failures, what about a new RC? I also merged #6187
that removes a duplicate feature that we would have to support forever
otherwise.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 9:09 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Since the unit test failure is just a bug in test code, I will change my
> vote to +1.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
>    1. Downloaded the source tarball.
>       1. Verified signature and checksum.
>       2. Untar the source archive.
>       3. ./gradlew build. unit test failure due to a bug in test code.
>       non blocker.
>    2. Flink SQL testing (both 1.15 and 1.16)
>       1. Downloaded Iceberg-flink-runtime jars (1.15 and 1.16) from Nexus
>       staging repository.
>       2. Batch write worked
>       3. FLIP-27 source batch read worked
>       4. FLIP-27 source streaming read worked
>       5. There is a regression in Flink 1.16.0 (not related to Iceberg
>       release). Filed ticket. FLINK-30035.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steven
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 8:30 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner <edu...@tabular.io>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>>    - validated checksum and signature
>>    - checked license docs & ran RAT checks
>>    - ran build and tests with JDK11
>>
>> The mentioned test failures around TestExpressionUtil is something we can
>> fix <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6200> without holding back
>> the release imo as it's only a test issue around timezones.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 7:33 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> -1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. Downloaded the source tarball.
>>>       1. Verified signature and checksum.
>>>       2. Untar the source archive.
>>>       3. ./gradlew build. There are unit test failures (details in the
>>>       end).
>>>    2. Flink SQL testing (both 1.15 and 1.16)
>>>       1. Downloaded Iceberg-flink-runtime jars (1.15 and 1.16) from
>>>       Nexus staging repository.
>>>       2. Batch write worked
>>>       3. FLIP-27 source batch read worked
>>>       4. FLIP-27 source streaming read worked
>>>       5. There is a regression in Flink 1.16.0 (not related to Iceberg
>>>       release). Filed ticket. FLINK-30035.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Steven
>>>
>>>
>>> > Task :iceberg-api:test
>>>
>>>
>>> org.apache.iceberg.expressions.TestExpressionUtil >
>>> testSanitizeDateNextWeek FAILED
>>>
>>>     java.lang.AssertionError: Literals should match
>>> expected:<["(date-7-days-from-now)"]> but was:<["(date-6-days-from-now)"]>
>>>
>>>         at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
>>>
>>>         at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
>>>
>>>         at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:120)
>>>
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.iceberg.expressions.TestExpressionUtil.assertEquals(TestExpressionUtil.java:825)
>>>
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.iceberg.expressions.TestExpressionUtil.assertEquals(TestExpressionUtil.java:819)
>>>
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.iceberg.expressions.TestExpressionUtil.testSanitizeDateNextWeek(TestExpressionUtil.java:583)
>>>
>>>
>>> org.apache.iceberg.expressions.TestExpressionUtil >
>>> testSanitizeDateLastWeek FAILED
>>>
>>>     java.lang.AssertionError: Literals should match
>>> expected:<["(date-7-days-ago)"]> but was:<["(date-8-days-ago)"]>
>>>
>>>         at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
>>>
>>>         at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
>>>
>>>         at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:120)
>>>
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.iceberg.expressions.TestExpressionUtil.assertEquals(TestExpressionUtil.java:825)
>>>
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.iceberg.expressions.TestExpressionUtil.assertEquals(TestExpressionUtil.java:819)
>>>
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.iceberg.expressions.TestExpressionUtil.testSanitizeDateLastWeek(TestExpressionUtil.java:563)
>>>
>>>
>>> org.apache.iceberg.expressions.TestExpressionUtil >
>>> testSanitizeDateToday FAILED
>>>
>>>     java.lang.AssertionError: Literals should match
>>> expected:<["(date-today)"]> but was:<["(date-1-days-ago)"]>
>>>
>>>         at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
>>>
>>>         at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
>>>
>>>         at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:120)
>>>
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.iceberg.expressions.TestExpressionUtil.assertEquals(TestExpressionUtil.java:825)
>>>
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.iceberg.expressions.TestExpressionUtil.assertEquals(TestExpressionUtil.java:819)
>>>
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.iceberg.expressions.TestExpressionUtil.testSanitizeDateToday(TestExpressionUtil.java:543)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 8:42 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>>
>>>> Quickly check build and "Apache legal related", not deep dive tests as
>>>> I'm still learning Iceberg ;)
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:28 PM Gabor Kaszab <gaborkas...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi Everyone,
>>>> >
>>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>>>> Iceberg 1.1.0 release.
>>>> >
>>>> > The commit ID is 1d10c53906847893b45c6acb0137dcb55a15353d
>>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.1.0-rc1
>>>> > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.1.0-rc1
>>>> > *
>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/1d10c53906847893b45c6acb0137dcb55a15353d
>>>> >
>>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>>> > *
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.1.0-rc1
>>>> >
>>>> > You can find the KEYS file here:
>>>> > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS
>>>> >
>>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>>>> repository URL is:
>>>> > *
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1109/
>>>> >
>>>> > Please download, verify, and test.
>>>> >
>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>> >
>>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.1.0
>>>> > [ ] +0
>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>> >
>>>> > PS.: Thanks Fokko for helping me out with the steps requiring
>>>> committer privileges!
>>>>
>>>

-- 
Ryan Blue
Tabular

Reply via email to