+0

Looks great, except that the version isn’t correct: pyiceberg.__version__
returns 0.1.0rc2

Passing:

   - Verified LICENSE and NOTICE content in the tarball and whl (nit:
   NOTICE and LICENSE are in different directories)
   - Checked sha512 sums and signatures
   - Ran RAT checks (nit: the poetry.lock file is not excluded if you
   create it)
   - Ran tests
   - Installed the CLI and ran basic commands with a REST metastore

Issues:

   - pyiceberg.__version__ returns 0.1.0rc2 instead of 0.1.0


On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 12:51 PM Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> Thanks everyone for giving it a try and for the feedback. Much appreciated! 
> I'm
> canceling RC1 because the version of the package itself was tagged with
> RC1. This doesn't allow us to release the code as is since we would have to
> remove the RC postfix.
>
> Other things to make the release smoother:
>
>    - Include the Makefile to the source distribution to make the
>    reviewing easier (see new commands below).
>    - Include NOTICE to the source distribution.
>    - Include a license checker in the source distribution to easily check
>    the licenses.
>    - Fixed the path in the checksum, so we can use shasum -c (see below).
>
> I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg
> 0.1.0 release.
>
> The commit ID is 83e3ab0b9fb57890d63130499e84c55b91fc0c17
>
>    - This corresponds to the tag: pyiceberg-0.1.0rc2
>    (289b4737d772260d7967c028bbb3f9a07e295ea8)
>    - https://github.com/apache/iceberg/releases/tag/pyiceberg-0.1.0rc2
>    -
>    
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/83e3ab0b9fb57890d63130499e84c55b91fc0c17
>    - Difference between RC1 and RC2:
>    
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/compare/pyiceberg-0.1.0rc1...pyiceberg-0.1.0rc2
>
>
> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/pyiceberg-0.1.0rc2/
>
> You can find the KEYS file here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS
>
> You can run the following to check the signature:
> > wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS
> > gpg --import KEYS
> > gpg --verify pyiceberg-0.1.0rc2.tar.gz.asc pyiceberg-0.1.0rc2.tar.gz
> gpg: Signature made za 24 sep 21:07:12 2022 CEST
> gpg:                using RSA key FCD3779E399C53D995FC82A35171BA3E54493550
> gpg: Good signature from "Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org>" [ultimate]
>
>
> And check the checksums:
> > shasum -c pyiceberg-0.1.0.tar.gz.sha512
> pyiceberg-0.1.0.tar.gz: OK
>
> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on pypi:
> https://pypi.org/project/pyiceberg/0.1.0rc2/
>
> And can be installed using: pip3 install pyiceberg==0.1.0rc2
>
> Testing can be done using:
>
> > wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/pyiceberg-0.1.0rc2/pyiceberg-0.1.0.tar.gz
> > tar -xf pyiceberg-0.1.0.tar.gz
> > cd pyiceberg-0.1.0
> > make check-license
> > make install && make test
>
> Please download, verify, and test.
>
> Please vote in the next 96 hours (extended due to the weekend).
> [ ] +1 Release this as PyIceberg 0.1.0
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>
> Please don't hesitate to reach out if there are any questions,
>
> Kind regards,
> Fokko
>
>

-- 
Ryan Blue
Tabular

Reply via email to