-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/831/#review778
-----------------------------------------------------------



trunk/metastore/src/test/org/apache/hadoop/hive/metastore/TestHiveMetaStore.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/831/#comment1676>

    Sorry I missed this before, but you need to add a getTableObjectsByName() 
method to IMetaStoreClient and HiveMetaStoreClient, and use that method here 
instead of calling client.client.get_table_objects_by_name(). Everything else 
looks good so, so you can either update this patch, or else open another ticket 
to address this issue. Please let me know what you want to do. Thanks.


- Carl


On 2011-06-07 01:11:44, Sohan Jain wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/831/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-06-07 01:11:44)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive, Paul Yang and Ashutosh Chauhan.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Created a function "multi_get_table" that retrieves multiple tables on one 
> trip to the hive metastore, saving round trip time.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug HIVE-2188.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2188
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/metastore/if/hive_metastore.thrift 1130342 
>   
> trunk/metastore/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/metastore/HiveMetaStore.java 
> 1130342 
>   trunk/metastore/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/metastore/ObjectStore.java 
> 1130342 
>   trunk/metastore/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/metastore/RawStore.java 
> 1130342 
>   
> trunk/metastore/src/test/org/apache/hadoop/hive/metastore/TestHiveMetaStore.java
>  1130342 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/831/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added a test case to testMetasore() in TestHiveServer.  Also tested for speed 
> improvements in a client session.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sohan
> 
>

Reply via email to