stoty commented on PR #615:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/615#issuecomment-2688108657

   > > I can do that, but then then the only difference between the old and new 
classes will be the packages and the case. Machines don't care, but I see that 
causing grief for users.
   > 
   > Don't rename old ones, only new ones. If old ones are reused maye it would 
be better to copy them?
   
   I wasn't clear. The classes are different, but their names are almost 
identical.
   
   As the Scheme is not enabled by default, users have to add some boilerplate 
code to enable SPNEGO at all.
   It is now too easy to use the old SPNegoScheme instead of the new 
SpnegoScheme in that boilerplate IMO.
   
   i have renamed  KerberCredentials, and added a backwards compatibility 
subclass.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org

Reply via email to