How about is and !is ? Would be nice to have them :) On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:53 PM Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
> > > ----- Mail original ----- > > De: "Graeme Rocher" <graeme.roc...@gmail.com> > > À: dev@groovy.apache.org > > Cc: d...@groovy.incubator.apache.org > > Envoyé: Vendredi 18 Novembre 2016 15:16:04 > > Objet: Re: Negative relational operators for Groovy 3 > > > In agreement with everyone else here. > > > > +1 to !in and !instanceof > > -1 to everything else > > > > Cheers > > even !! > > Rémi > > > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> OK. I see :) > >> > >> > >> > >> 在 Cédric Champeau [via Groovy] <ml-node+[hidden email]>，2016年11月18日 > >> 下午9:18写道： > >> > >> I agree with Jochen and Guillaume: +1 to !instanceof and !in, but I > don't > >> like the other variants. > >> > >> 2016-11-18 14:11 GMT+01:00 Daniel Sun <[hidden email]>: > >>> > >>> Hi Jochen, > >>> > >>> > I think !instanceof and !in are ok. The others... not sure here. > Right > >>> > now a*=b, which means !< is >=. And in this > >>> > case I actually prefer >=. > >>> > >>> Sometimes we write code like "!(a > b)", now we can write "a !> b" > >>> instead, which is much close to our mind :) > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Daniel.Sun > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> View this message in context: > >>> > http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for-Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736816.html > >>> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > >> below: > >> > http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for-Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736817.html > >> To unsubscribe from Negative relational operators for Groovy 3, click > here. > >> NAML > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> View this message in context: Re: Negative relational operators for > Groovy 3 > >> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > -- > > Graeme Rocher >
