Perhaps only on method reference, filter (Objects!::isNull) ? Remi
On November 18, 2016 4:10:24 PM GMT+01:00, Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote: >On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Graeme Rocher ><graeme.roc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> In agreement with everyone else here. >> >> +1 to !in and !instanceof >> -1 to everything else > >Same for me. I am undecided about sticky or not (allowing a space) but >easier to be conservative and loosen later. >I'm -1 for 'as' (no one has proposed it but another of our operators) >and probably 'is' too. If we do is, I don't see why we wouldn't do it >for all methods (that return boolean), e.g. assert 'a'.!isUpperCase() >and I am a little hesitant about such a notation. > >Paul. > >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> >wrote: >>> OK. I see :) >>> >>> >>> >>> 在 Cédric Champeau [via Groovy] <ml-node+[hidden email]>，2016年11月18日 >>> 下午9:18写道： >>> >>> I agree with Jochen and Guillaume: +1 to !instanceof and !in, but I >don't >>> like the other variants. >>> >>> 2016-11-18 14:11 GMT+01:00 Daniel Sun <[hidden email]>: >>>> >>>> Hi Jochen, >>>> >>>> > I think !instanceof and !in are ok. The others... not sure here. >Right >>>> > now a*=b, which means !< is >=. And in this >>>> > case I actually prefer >=. >>>> >>>> Sometimes we write code like "!(a > b)", now we can write "a >!> b" >>>> instead, which is much close to our mind :) >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Daniel.Sun >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> >http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for-Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736816.html >>>> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >discussion >>> below: >>> >http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for-Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736817.html >>> To unsubscribe from Negative relational operators for Groovy 3, >click here. >>> NAML >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> View this message in context: Re: Negative relational operators for >Groovy 3 >>> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> -- >> Graeme Rocher -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
