In agreement with everyone else here. +1 to !in and !instanceof -1 to everything else
Cheers On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> wrote: > OK. I see :) > > > > 在 Cédric Champeau [via Groovy] <ml-node+[hidden email]>，2016年11月18日 > 下午9:18写道： > > I agree with Jochen and Guillaume: +1 to !instanceof and !in, but I don't > like the other variants. > > 2016-11-18 14:11 GMT+01:00 Daniel Sun <[hidden email]>: >> >> Hi Jochen, >> >> > I think !instanceof and !in are ok. The others... not sure here. Right >> > now a*=b, which means !< is >=. And in this >> > case I actually prefer >=. >> >> Sometimes we write code like "!(a > b)", now we can write "a !> b" >> instead, which is much close to our mind :) >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel.Sun >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for-Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736816.html >> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > ________________________________ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for-Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736817.html > To unsubscribe from Negative relational operators for Groovy 3, click here. > NAML > > > ________________________________ > View this message in context: Re: Negative relational operators for Groovy 3 > Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Graeme Rocher
